2017
DOI: 10.1080/01930826.2017.1288977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadening Impact for Library Exhibitions and Speakers

Abstract: Brian W. Keith, Laurie N. Taylor & Lourdes Santamaría-Wheeler. "Broadening Impact for Library Exhibitions and Speakers." Journal of Library Administration, Pages 1-17 | Published online: 17 Apr 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2017.128897

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the academic library is challenged with creating innovative ways to broaden the impact that exhibitions have on their audiences and creating online versions of displays is one such approach. Libraries have gone beyond the idea of simply uploading an online version of an exhibition to a library's website and now find novel ways to engage their communities using technology (Dysert et al, 2018;Keith et al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the academic library is challenged with creating innovative ways to broaden the impact that exhibitions have on their audiences and creating online versions of displays is one such approach. Libraries have gone beyond the idea of simply uploading an online version of an exhibition to a library's website and now find novel ways to engage their communities using technology (Dysert et al, 2018;Keith et al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation would also be further improved with the incorporation of more multimedia technology that can digitally assess the sections of the exhibition that receive more traction. New media tools like that used by Keith et al (2017) would also provide more immediate and effective engagement with viewers and though designed for museum exhibitions, it is worth exploring how Serrell's (2006) framework for judging exhibitions can be adapted to suit the needs of academic libraries in SIDS such as the UWI Mona.…”
Section: Evaluatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beyond a simple introduction to a collection, scholars such as Caswell (1985) identified four results from exhibitions: education for patrons, increased circulation of items, improved public relations and influence on collection development. Some libraries have taken exhibitions and exhibition spaces to the next level (see Beahan et al, 2009;Beals, 2007;Keith et al, 2017;Leousis and Sproull, 2016;Vander Broek and Rodgers, 2015) and have involved students, departments and other campus partners to either co-create, co-curate or inform the space and the type of material and content included. Some of these exhibitions have also utilized technology in new ways; this helps facilitate learning with patrons or helps bring digital content into the physical space.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the professional literature, special collections librarians and archivists, especially in a university setting, have written about their experiences curating exhibits with a variety of collaborators. The reasons they cite for curating exhibits range from the goal to engage with the public to promote collections, attract new users, inspire research projects, drive donor support, promote themselves as producers of research and not just collectors and to educate the public by providing context for archival materials (Brannock, 2009: 32; Chen et al, 2015: 63, 70; Keith et al, 2017: 392; Shankweiler and Seguin, 2018: 306). In addition, many specifically note the experiential learning opportunities exhibit curation can offer undergraduate and graduate students to develop their research skills sets (Prendergast and Totleben, 2018: 134, 138, 149; Sand et al, 2017: 12; Swanick et al, 2015: 19).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%