2000
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7269.1136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadening access to undergraduate medical education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their outcome evaluations, especially in relation to non-traditional students, may be important in guiding future policy across the UK 2 16 17. Our data suggest that the current four stage approach to student selection is sound, but we now have concerns that the introduction by UCAS of open references will reduce the opportunities for head teachers to draw attention to personal qualities or difficulties that might make it difficult for a student to succeed in medicine; structured references might be more helpful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their outcome evaluations, especially in relation to non-traditional students, may be important in guiding future policy across the UK 2 16 17. Our data suggest that the current four stage approach to student selection is sound, but we now have concerns that the introduction by UCAS of open references will reduce the opportunities for head teachers to draw attention to personal qualities or difficulties that might make it difficult for a student to succeed in medicine; structured references might be more helpful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle that medical school intake should reflect the ethnic and socioeconomic mix of the population has been endorsed by the UK Council on Heads of Medical Schools1 and underwritten by generous “Widening Participation” payments to universities that recruit from underrepresented postcodes 2 3. Despite these incentives, recruiting applicants from non-traditional groups is proving difficult,4 and major disparities by socioeconomic status and some ethnic groups remain 5 – 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Admissions systems seek to achieve a fair and equitable system to select doctors of the future; however, these data from 2006 reveal that neither the applicants, nor successful applicants, are representative of their cohort in society. Angel and Johnson, 39 argue that the 'social, cultural and ethnic background of medical graduates should refl ect broadly the diversity of the patient population', and that 'the groups of people that are underrepresented in the medical profession tend to be overrepresented in the patient population who may be better served by doctors from these sub-populations'. Comparing the best data available, it would seem that the ethnic takeup by UCAS in general is more closely aligned with the young adult population in England (the best data available).…”
Section: Admissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%