Broadcasting anti‐media populism in the Philippines: YouTube influencers, networked political brokerage, and implications for governance

Abstract

This article interrogates platform governance and accountability amid the growing role of influencers in constructing political discourses, and particularly, in the intermediation of anti-media ideological frames through their embeddedness in networked assemblages. We deploy the concept of "networked political brokerage" to examine the sociotechnical relations among influencers, the platform, and its users, and how this dynamic assemblage engages in the intermediation of anti-media populism. The study draws from a critical examination of the network and discursive tactics deployed by Filipino YouTube influencers who advance partisan political commentary and deceptive narratives to delegitimize mainstream media institutions through issue network analysis concerning the franchise denial and eventual shutdown of the Philippines' oldest media network, ABS-CBN. We problematize how influencers engage platform affordances and cultures of use to enable, amplify, and fortify the brokering of their political agenda within a larger network of political actors, while eliding accountability. Through the mutually affirming relationship of content creators and the platform, networked hyperpoliticized contents gain visibility and galvanize anti-media rhetoric. Ultimately, the article raises concerns on the social consequences of networked political brokerage and offers a framework for how governance and policy discussions can treat the functioning of such networked political influence.

Cross-Cultural Gender-Based Investigation of Filipino and Chinese Facebook Users’ Disagreement Strategies

“…Within this cultural context, disagreements are approached with a conscious intent to minimize face threats and preserve mutual understanding and social cohesion [51,52]. In the communication process, Filipinos frequently resort to indirect strategies when articulating their disagreements, a practice aligned with the overarching goals of saving face, respecting diverse viewpoints, and maintaining the balance of harmonious relationships [53].…”

Democracy in the digital era

“…Authoritarianism, populism, and fascism in some corners of contemporary politics may also work to destabilization of democratic systems of governance (Bolsover, 2018; Heft et al, 2020; Soriano & Gaw, 2022). These political ideologies tend to reject democratic norms and values, such as the rule of law and civil liberties, as well as principles of international cooperation and multilateralism, which can exacerbate geopolitical tensions (Huang & Mayer, 2022) and limit the capacity for states to work together to tackle global challenges (Uldam, 2013).…”