Broadcasting and market-driven politics in the UK and Germany: the Peacock Committee in comparative perspective

Abstract

When, from the 1980s onwards, market-driven politics won widespread recognition in liberal capitalist Western democracies, processes of broadcasting marketization in the UK and Germany were decisively determined by two inquiries: the Committee on the Financing of the BBC, chaired by Alan Peacock, and the Commission for the Development of the Technical Communications System (KtK), chaired by Eberhard Witte. This article compares how both inquiries, driven by their chairmen, affected domestic communications policy-making. The research is situated within a critical political economy framework and it is argued that critiques from scholars within cultural policy depicting Alan Peacock and the inquiry he chaired as driven by a narrowly economistic understanding of broadcasting are partly unjustified. As the comparison with the radical restructuring pursued by Eberhard Witte brings to the fore, Peacock, in fact followed a moderate reform agenda of gradual change, aiming to preserve some core cultural elements within public service broadcasting.

The autonomous world reversed: comparing liberal policy and autonomy in the performing arts

“…Politically, one may emphasize supply (or production) or demand (or consumption). The term demand-based cultural policy has similarities with the term market-driven cultural policy (Häyrynen 2013, Potschka 2013). However, my empirical investigations from England, and the application of the theory of justification, show how demand-based cultural production is not solely about producing art for those most willing to pay (e.g.…”

The end of the television licence fee? Applying the German household levy model to the United Kingdom

“…In this system, viewers would have ‘the option of purchasing the broadcasting services they require from as many alternative sources of supply as possible’ (Peacock, 1986: para 592). Following the Peacock report, in 1987, the licence fee was indexed to the Retail Price Index (Potschka, 2013). Peacock’s long-term vision, however – even though not implemented – continues to inspire the UK policy discourse.…”

Reconsidering Media Economics: From Orthodoxies to Heterodoxies

“…Appointed by Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who had made known her view that the BBC should be funded through advertising, Alan Peacock undertook a skeptical and highly influential review of the foundations of PSB, rejecting Thatcher's option but recommending that, over time, the universal license fee should be replaced by an opt-in subscription model as the multichannel mediascape matured and that the objectives of PSB could also be delivered through contestable funding available to a wider range of providers. 45 Fast-forward to the present, and one way in which governments have sought in recent years to stress-test the role of PSM has been through the application of "public-value tests" to the development of new services. 46 Such tests proposed an operational understanding of public value, whereby strategies could be assessed in terms of: (1) their contribution to outcomes deemed valuable by the community and the government as their elected representatives; (2) their sustainability in terms of gaining ongoing support from key political and other stakeholders; and (3) their feasibility in terms of the funding, technology, staff skills, and organizational capabilities needed to deliver the required public-value outcomes.…”