2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2013.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadband near-infrared downconversion luminescence in Eu2+–Yb3+ codoped Ca9Y(PO4)7

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the decay curves demonstrate double‐exponential feature, and the decay times can be determined using a curve fitting technique based on the following formula: I=A+B1enormalτfalse/τ1+B2enormalτfalse/τ2where I is phosphorescence intensity, A , B 1 , and B 2 are constants, t is time, τ 1 and τ 2 are decay constants deciding the rates for rapid and the slow exponentially decay components, respectively. The average decay times τ avg can be calculated by the following equation: normalτnormalavg=(B1normalτ12+B2normalτ22)false/(B1normalτ1+B2normalτ2)also, from the luminescence decay curves an estimate of energy‐transfer efficiency (ETE, η tr, x %Yb ) and the total quantum efficiency (QE, η x %Yb ) can be obtained using the following equations: normalηx%Yb=normalηnormalHofalse(1ηnormaltr,x%normalYbfalse)+2normalηnormalYbnormalηtr,x%Ybwhere I denotes the decay intensity and x % stands for the Yb 3+ concentration. η Ho and η Yb represent the QE of Ho 3+ and Yb 3+ , and both of them are set to one where the nonradiative relaxation is ignored .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the decay curves demonstrate double‐exponential feature, and the decay times can be determined using a curve fitting technique based on the following formula: I=A+B1enormalτfalse/τ1+B2enormalτfalse/τ2where I is phosphorescence intensity, A , B 1 , and B 2 are constants, t is time, τ 1 and τ 2 are decay constants deciding the rates for rapid and the slow exponentially decay components, respectively. The average decay times τ avg can be calculated by the following equation: normalτnormalavg=(B1normalτ12+B2normalτ22)false/(B1normalτ1+B2normalτ2)also, from the luminescence decay curves an estimate of energy‐transfer efficiency (ETE, η tr, x %Yb ) and the total quantum efficiency (QE, η x %Yb ) can be obtained using the following equations: normalηx%Yb=normalηnormalHofalse(1ηnormaltr,x%normalYbfalse)+2normalηnormalYbnormalηtr,x%Ybwhere I denotes the decay intensity and x % stands for the Yb 3+ concentration. η Ho and η Yb represent the QE of Ho 3+ and Yb 3+ , and both of them are set to one where the nonradiative relaxation is ignored .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our current understanding of the periodic table’s f block marks the result of decades of research pursued by scientists of various stripes: from chemists to materials scientists, physicists, and biologists. As a consequence, the modern scientific catalog of understood phenomena arising either directly or indirectly from lanthanide chemistry and electronic structure is expansive, ranging from multiphoton up- and downconversion processes to ligand–lanthanide chelation thermodynamics in solution to lanthanide binding and efflux mechanisms in biological systems. In particular, it has become both widely accepted and abundantly clear that the diversity in the f-orbital electronic structures of the lanthanide elements makes them prime candidates for various possible applications in optoelectronic devices, deep-tissue imaging, and luminescence sensing. , ,,, Interest in these applications provides much of the motivation driving both applied and fundamental research in lanthanide photochemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to their possible photonic applications, the bulk of the photochemical literature of lanthanides has involved work on either molecular complexes, nanocrystalline forms of lanthanides, or glasses where emissive lanthanides occur as either doped or primary constituents. ,,, In the case of molecular complexes, lanthanide luminescence is typically interrogated through the photosensitization of lanthanide excited states using organic ligands, as schematically depicted in Figure (panel a). ,, The employment of this “antenna” effect has the benefit of yielding lanthanide excited states with far greater efficiency than is generally possible through direct, intraband pumping of f levels, a partial result of the generally high molar absorptivities of organic/aromatic ligands (∼10 3 –10 5 M –1 cm –1 ). This process stands in stark contrast to the relatively dismal absorption coefficients observed for the direct excitation of most lanthanide transitions (∼1–10 M –1 cm –1 ), a consequence of the symmetry-forbidden and, in some cases, spin-forbidden nature of intraconfigurational f transitions present in these elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 One of the promising materials in phosphates family is Ca 9 Y(PO 4 ) 7 , which has two different cations (Ca 2+ and Y 3+ ) that are available for lanthanides substitution. [8][9][10][11] This material doped with Eu 2+ and Eu 3+ ions simultaneously consists of two components that are essential to achieve the emission of white light. Ca 9 Y(PO 4 ) 7 belongs to the whitlockite family and can be described by the general formula: Ca 9 R(PO 4 ) 7 , where R ¼ Ln, Pr, Eu, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Y, Bi, Al, Lu.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%