2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broad taxon and gene sampling indicate that chaetognaths are protostomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite some troubled beginnings due to the shortcomings of using only a restricted set of taxa (Philippe et al, 2005a), phylogenomics has provided strong corroborating support for the new animal phylogeny, essentially confirming the monophyly of Protostomia, Ecdysozoa, and Lophotrochozoa (Baurain et al, 2007;Dunn et al, 2008;Lartillot and Philippe, 2008;Philippe et al, 2005b). Phylogenomics has also helped solving some longstanding mysteries such as the position of chaetognaths, which finally appear to belong to Protostomia (Marletaz et al, 2006;Matus et al, 2006) and also proposed unexpected phylogenetic affinities for enigmatic taxa such as Buddenbrockia plumatellae recently unmasked as a cnidarian worm (Jimenez-Guri et al, 2007), or Xenoturbella bocki, representing a fourth deuterostome phylum on its own (Bourlat et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Despite some troubled beginnings due to the shortcomings of using only a restricted set of taxa (Philippe et al, 2005a), phylogenomics has provided strong corroborating support for the new animal phylogeny, essentially confirming the monophyly of Protostomia, Ecdysozoa, and Lophotrochozoa (Baurain et al, 2007;Dunn et al, 2008;Lartillot and Philippe, 2008;Philippe et al, 2005b). Phylogenomics has also helped solving some longstanding mysteries such as the position of chaetognaths, which finally appear to belong to Protostomia (Marletaz et al, 2006;Matus et al, 2006) and also proposed unexpected phylogenetic affinities for enigmatic taxa such as Buddenbrockia plumatellae recently unmasked as a cnidarian worm (Jimenez-Guri et al, 2007), or Xenoturbella bocki, representing a fourth deuterostome phylum on its own (Bourlat et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The sister-group relationship between chaetognaths and the remaining bilaterians has been under debate for decades. Chaetognaths have been related to deuterostomes (Ghirardelli 1981;Brusca and Brusca 2002), ecdysozoans (Littlewood et al, 1998;Zrzavy et al, 1998;Peterson and Eernisse 2001), spiralians (Matus et al, 2006) and as sister taxon to Spiralia + Ecdysozoa (Giribet et al, 2000;Helfenbein and Boore 2004;Marletaz et al, 2006;Nesnidal et al, 2013). However, new molecular and morphological evidence has supported their phylogenetic position as an independent lineage in the protostomes beside ecdysozoans and spiralians (Dunn et al, 2008).…”
Section: Tracing the Origin Of The Nodal Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, all phylogenomic studies that have used dense taxon sampling did not find any support in favour of Coelomata (e.g. Philippe et al 2005b;Marletaz et al 2006;Matus et al 2006).…”
Section: Introduction (A) the Limits Of Morphologymentioning
confidence: 97%