2022
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14579
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broad scale assessment of key drivers of streamflow generation in urban and urbanizing rivers

Abstract: Urbanization is characterized by increased impervious cover, artificial drainage via sewers, soil compaction, and vegetation removal, which fundamentally alters how water moves across landscapes. Less rainwater and snowmelt infiltrate the subsurface and stream responses to precipitation are faster and larger compared to natural environments. While the impacts of catchment imperviousness on hydrologic processes have been widely investigated, the relationship between stream hydrologic response and infrastructure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such modeling would also need to be integrated with the capabilities of models such as SWMM (Rossman & Simon, 2022 ) and MIKE + (DHI, 2024 ) to parameterize the effects of non-stationarity in the management of the catchment, with increasing use of flood storage retention ponds in sustainable urban drainage, as well as local effects of groundwater pumping. This would also benefit from the storm drainage network being directly parameterized when such information is available (e.g., Ariano & Oswald, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such modeling would also need to be integrated with the capabilities of models such as SWMM (Rossman & Simon, 2022 ) and MIKE + (DHI, 2024 ) to parameterize the effects of non-stationarity in the management of the catchment, with increasing use of flood storage retention ponds in sustainable urban drainage, as well as local effects of groundwater pumping. This would also benefit from the storm drainage network being directly parameterized when such information is available (e.g., Ariano & Oswald, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Q MAX was reached fastest at 02HC027, where the largest average Q TOT value was also observed. The high‐magnitude and flashy responses of the highly urbanized 02HC027 sub‐watershed (Table 1 and Figure S1) are due to the relatively large impervious area coverage, denser road network and water conveyance by stormwater infrastructure (Ariano & Oswald, 2022a, 2022b). While these factors are often associated with larger runoff ratios (Shuster et al, 2005), this rationale does not explain the observed maximum Q TOT across sub‐watersheds: although the maximum Q TOT at 02HC027 was large, the biggest runoff responses were at 02HC031, which has physical characteristics near Humber River watershed averages (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean daily flashiness values were averaged by WY for spatial comparisons and trend analyses. The Richard‐Baker flashiness index is a routinely cited method for assessing streamflow variability in small urban streams (Ariano & Oswald, 2022; Booth & Konrad, 2017; Porter, 2022; Porter et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%