2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.79.016109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broad lifetime distributions for ordering dynamics in complex networks

Abstract: We search for conditions under which a characteristic time scale for ordering dynamics toward either of two absorbing states in a finite complex network of interactions does not exist. With this aim, we study random networks and networks with mesoscale community structure built up from randomly connected cliques. We find that large heterogeneity at the mesoscale level of the network appears to be a sufficient mechanism for the absence of a characteristic time for the dynamics. Such heterogeneity results in dyn… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(51 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For static networks, it is known that spatial structure has an effect on epidemics (see, e.g., [6,7]), and community structure slows down information diffusion due to trapping in dense regions [8][9][10]. There is an intimate relation between inhomogeneous link weights and network topology in social and communication networks [11,12]: Links within communities are strong, while links between them are weak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For static networks, it is known that spatial structure has an effect on epidemics (see, e.g., [6,7]), and community structure slows down information diffusion due to trapping in dense regions [8][9][10]. There is an intimate relation between inhomogeneous link weights and network topology in social and communication networks [11,12]: Links within communities are strong, while links between them are weak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from experiments presented earlier, together with the observations narrated by other authors [Epstein 2000;Toivonen et al 2009;Villatoro et al 2009], convinced us that subconventions are problematic obstacles to the emergence of global conventions. These subconventions thrive (amongst other reasons) because of the topological structure of the network where they emerge.…”
Section: Understanding Subconventionsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Therefore, agents can develop subconventions depending on their position on the topology of interaction. As identified by several authors [Salazar-Ramirez et al 2008;Toivonen et al 2009;Villatoro et al 2009], metastable subconventions interfere with the speed of the emergence of more general conventions. The problem of subconventions is a critical bottleneck that can derail emergence of conventions in agent societies, and mechanisms need to be developed that can alleviate this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is the possibility that fat-tailed IET distributions appear as a consequence of topological traps in the network of interaction under majority rule dynamics. These traps can lead to anomalous scaling of consensus times for a majority rule dynamics [31,32]. A consensus time is a global property of the system, but it remains unclear if this is also reflected in the microscopic dynamics, giving rise to broad IET distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%