2014
DOI: 10.5194/se-5-409-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BrO/SO<sub>2</sub> molar ratios from scanning DOAS measurements in the NOVAC network

Abstract: Abstract. The molar ratio of BrO to SO 2 is, like other halogen / sulfur ratios, a possible precursor for dynamic changes in the shallow part of a volcanic system. While the predictive significance of the BrO / SO 2 ratio has not been well constrained yet, it has the major advantage that this ratio can be readily measured using the remote-sensing technique differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) in the UV. While BrO / SO 2 ratios have been measured during several short-term field campaigns, this ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would lead to an OD of τ = S × σ max = 1.2 for MAX-DOAS measurements with a SCD S H 2 O = 4 × 10 23 molec cm −2 (a typical MAX-DOAS column density for mid-latitude summer conditions) under a telescope elevation angle of 3 • , which is clearly in disagreement with our observations. Also measurements of other tropospheric trace gases such as HCHO (336.5-359 nm) (Pinardi et al, 2013), .75 nm) and SO 2 (314.8-326.8 nm) (Lübcke et al, 2014), which would have also been affected, did not show any unknown differential absorption of this size but did yield residual spectra with at least 2 orders of magnitude smaller amplitudes.…”
Section: Absorption Of Water Vapour In the Uv Wavelength Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would lead to an OD of τ = S × σ max = 1.2 for MAX-DOAS measurements with a SCD S H 2 O = 4 × 10 23 molec cm −2 (a typical MAX-DOAS column density for mid-latitude summer conditions) under a telescope elevation angle of 3 • , which is clearly in disagreement with our observations. Also measurements of other tropospheric trace gases such as HCHO (336.5-359 nm) (Pinardi et al, 2013), .75 nm) and SO 2 (314.8-326.8 nm) (Lübcke et al, 2014), which would have also been affected, did not show any unknown differential absorption of this size but did yield residual spectra with at least 2 orders of magnitude smaller amplitudes.…”
Section: Absorption Of Water Vapour In the Uv Wavelength Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated spectra recorded between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2012 from these two NOVAC stations (see Garzon et al, 2013, andLübcke et al, 2014, for maps of the stations and more information on NO-VAC measurements at Nevado del Ruiz). After evaluating the spectra, we found that the instrument's GPS antennas occasionally reported erroneous times, which led to offsets in the time stamps of spectra of up to 55 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, even under the assumption that the HBr/SO 2 degassing ratio is purely pressure-dependent no quantitative deduction of the pressure change could be made based on BrO/SO 2 molar ratios. Further, it was even not yet possible to derive the sign of this correlation indirectly by empirical studies of BrO/SO 2 molar ratios simultaneously to pressure changes 15 (Bobrowski and Giuffrida (2012), Lübcke et al (2014)) because of the still limited data sets available. In the absence of an explicit interpretation of the BrO/SO 2 molar ratio, at least the reasoning that a change in BrO/SO 2 molar ratios is probably caused by a significant change in magmatic conditions appears to be nevertheless a reasonable hypothesis.…”
Section: Comparison Of Bro/so 2 Time Series With Meteorologymentioning
confidence: 99%