2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brittle and ductile crack-tip behavior in magnesium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well-known that continuum fracture mechanics is unable to explain many important fracture phenomena, including lattice trapping [7][8][9], crack tip instabilities [10][11][12][13], and crack velocities in steady-state [14], all of which depend intimately on the details of bonding between atoms [15]. Atomistic simulations have therefore become increasingly popular for studying crack tip deformation mechanisms and their implications for ductility [16], both in quasi-static [17][18][19][20] and dynamic [21][22][23][24] conditions. In the latter case, model interatomic potentials have found great utility in molecular dynamics simulations [12,13,[25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that continuum fracture mechanics is unable to explain many important fracture phenomena, including lattice trapping [7][8][9], crack tip instabilities [10][11][12][13], and crack velocities in steady-state [14], all of which depend intimately on the details of bonding between atoms [15]. Atomistic simulations have therefore become increasingly popular for studying crack tip deformation mechanisms and their implications for ductility [16], both in quasi-static [17][18][19][20] and dynamic [21][22][23][24] conditions. In the latter case, model interatomic potentials have found great utility in molecular dynamics simulations [12,13,[25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the critical K Ie is K Ie = β(θ, φ, C, ψ)γ usf (2) where θ, φ, and γ usf are the angle between the slip and crack planes, the complementary angle of the crack front and the slip direction, and the unstable stacking fault, respectively. Details for calculating β within anisotropic elasticity are also given in [22]. The same formulation can be used for the case of the symmetric tilt GBs 70 in cubic metals, which is the case studied here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the procedures to obtain accurate SF information in pure metals are readily available. Accurate γ sf and γ usf thus obtained can be used to better predict dislocation dissociation [4] and crack-tip behavior in hcp metals [53]. In SF calculations of metals with solid solution alloying, the NEB method can be applied to obtain a γ-line, but the result depends on the choice of the supercell size N 1 and N 2 , in addition to the usual N 3 -dependence, and will depend on how the solutes are distributed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%