1971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.1971.tb00644.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

British Sociology 1950–1970: A Journal Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Many of our authors do not provide comparative data, but Bechhofer (1996, p. 587) remarks that the four British journals on which he had data differed 'a great deal' -so his results would clearly have been different if he had used only the BJS; Williams, Hodgkinson, and Payne (2004) found that Work, Employment and Society (WES) for 1999-2000 had considerably more quantitative papers than did the four British more general journals; for 2008 report marked differences among the British journals in their proportion of qualitative empirical articles. The pattern of British journal difference for an earlier period is shown by Collison and Webber (1971), who found that Sociology had more authors per article, They are commonly used and peer reviewed, so give 'a picture of what could be considered to be research endorsed by the discipline' (MacInnes et al, in press) (Are the referees and editors a representative sample of the discipline, then?) 'Given both the high "intensity" and "extensity" of each journal's prestige, we hoped that an accurate portrayal of the major theoretical and methodological orientations existent within sociology would be forthcoming'.…”
Section: Samples Usedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…14 Many of our authors do not provide comparative data, but Bechhofer (1996, p. 587) remarks that the four British journals on which he had data differed 'a great deal' -so his results would clearly have been different if he had used only the BJS; Williams, Hodgkinson, and Payne (2004) found that Work, Employment and Society (WES) for 1999-2000 had considerably more quantitative papers than did the four British more general journals; for 2008 report marked differences among the British journals in their proportion of qualitative empirical articles. The pattern of British journal difference for an earlier period is shown by Collison and Webber (1971), who found that Sociology had more authors per article, They are commonly used and peer reviewed, so give 'a picture of what could be considered to be research endorsed by the discipline' (MacInnes et al, in press) (Are the referees and editors a representative sample of the discipline, then?) 'Given both the high "intensity" and "extensity" of each journal's prestige, we hoped that an accurate portrayal of the major theoretical and methodological orientations existent within sociology would be forthcoming'.…”
Section: Samples Usedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Strikingly absent, at least in comparison with the article production of British sociologists (cf. Collison and Webber, 1971), is a category for stratification; it is less surprising not to have gender, despite the inclusion of what became regarded as some classic founding works of feminism -the time for that was a little later. Also hardly present is the Lazarsfeld/survey style of work so prominent in America at the time, though this would not fit into any single category of the kind used.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Library General Patternmentioning
confidence: 95%