2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01293.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

British Perceptions of Ottoman Judicial Reform in the Late Nineteenth Century: Some Preliminary Insights

Abstract: In the second half of the nineteenth century, the Ottomans founded a new court system, the Nizamiye courts, as part of an empire-wide ambitious project of judicial and administrative reform, which involved legal transplantation from the French model. The institutional evolution of these courts was completed with elaborate legislation introduced in 1879. This article explores British consular and diplomatic accounts dispatched in the immediate aftermath of the 1879 reforms in an attempt to assess the value of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the Ottoman experience was "[l]ike other cases of legal transplantation in the history of the world, the resulting judicial system was an amalgam of local and borrowed law designed to address local needs and structures, and it was certainly not a carbon-copy of the French legal system". 74 Findley remarks that there were some changes in the tradition of Ottoman political thought from the 18 th century, and that Ottomans were interested in the French system because of its emphasis upon some concepts such as freedom, equality, centralisation and bureaucratisation. 75 To this end, it should be noted that the land law of 1858 was only partially inspired by the Western codes and was mainly based upon kanunnames, fatwās and imperial decrees.…”
Section: Codifications Through Legal Borrowing and Evolution Of Legal Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the Ottoman experience was "[l]ike other cases of legal transplantation in the history of the world, the resulting judicial system was an amalgam of local and borrowed law designed to address local needs and structures, and it was certainly not a carbon-copy of the French legal system". 74 Findley remarks that there were some changes in the tradition of Ottoman political thought from the 18 th century, and that Ottomans were interested in the French system because of its emphasis upon some concepts such as freedom, equality, centralisation and bureaucratisation. 75 To this end, it should be noted that the land law of 1858 was only partially inspired by the Western codes and was mainly based upon kanunnames, fatwās and imperial decrees.…”
Section: Codifications Through Legal Borrowing and Evolution Of Legal Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu sınıfın ayrıntıları hakkında bilgi için bk. Kemal H. Karpat, Kısa Türkiye Tarihi 1800-2012, haz., G. Ayas (İstanbul: Timaş Yayınları, 2015. 20 Karpat,a.g.e.,43.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Nizamiye mahkemelerinde uygulanmak üzere hazırlanan Mecelle'nin altyapısının şeri hükümler ve benzer anlama gelecek şekilde şeriye mahkemeleri literatürünün bir özeti niteliğinde olması da yukarıdaki görüşün en önemli kanıtıdır (Ekinci, 2004: 254). Dolayısıyla bu dönemde gerçekleştirilen Osmanlı hukuk reformlarının Batı'nın baskısıyla şekillendiğini savunan geleneksel anlatımın yerine, yeni mahkemelerin kurulması yönündeki kararın gerek Osmanlıların gerekse de yabancıların adli ihtiyaçlarının karşılanması amacıyla oluşturulmuş orijinal bir Osmanlı çözümü olarak değerlendirilmesi daha doğrudur (Rubin, 2012(Rubin, : 1009.…”
unclassified