1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980228)17:4<407::aid-sim742>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

British 1990 growth reference centiles for weight, height, body mass index and head circumference fitted by maximum penalized likelihood

Abstract: To update the British growth reference, anthropometric data for weight, height, body mass index (weight/height2) and head circumference from 17 distinct surveys representative of England, Scotland and Wales (37,700 children, age range 23 weeks gestation to 23 years) were analysed by maximum penalized likelihood using the LMS method. This estimates the measurement centiles in terms of three age-sex-specific cubic spline curves: the L curve (Box-Cox power to remove skewness), M curve (median) and S curve (coeffi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
682
1
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,004 publications
(696 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
682
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Height is an example of Normally distributed data, yet log height is also acceptably Normal as well } see Section 4.6 for example. Height has a small CV, 4 per cent or so [17], which means that transformation does not introduce much skewness. In any case, if results are required in percentage units, this may be su$cient reason for a log transformation even though the data are not particularly skew.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Height is an example of Normally distributed data, yet log height is also acceptably Normal as well } see Section 4.6 for example. Height has a small CV, 4 per cent or so [17], which means that transformation does not introduce much skewness. In any case, if results are required in percentage units, this may be su$cient reason for a log transformation even though the data are not particularly skew.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The same coe$cient can also be interpreted as the power of bone width when the regression equation is antilogged, but this is not discussed further here.) Another example appears in Table II of Cole et al [17], where di!erences in height and weight between data sets estimated by regression analysis are presented in sympercent units.…”
Section: Group Comparison By Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth was assessed according to height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) and these data were converted to standard deviation (Z) scores [14]. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 8 software [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BMI was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared (kg/m 2 ). BMI-z scores were subsequently calculated using the LMS Growth method (Cole et al 1998). Skinfold thickness was measured with a Holtain Caliper to the nearest 0.2 mm in triplicate in the left side at biceps, triceps, subscapular, suprailiac, thigh, and medial calf (Crymych, UK) ).…”
Section: Physical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%