1962
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(62)90288-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brisket disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite a 2‐fold increase in RHF mortality, the number of cattle that died of RHF in 2012 was relativity minor when compared to DD: approximately 4‐5 times more cattle died of DD than RHF. Although death loss from RHF was relatively minor, the occurrence of RHF in feedlot cattle is noteworthy for 2 reasons: First, before the 1970s, RHF was only reported in cattle at altitudes over 2,130 m;3, 4, 9 therefore, a 2‐fold increase in RHF over a 12 year period in feedlots located at low (657 m) to moderate (1,145 m) elevations deserves attention. Second, although RHF occurred throughout the feeding period, half of all cases occurred after 19 weeks; this makes death loss from RHF particularly costly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite a 2‐fold increase in RHF mortality, the number of cattle that died of RHF in 2012 was relativity minor when compared to DD: approximately 4‐5 times more cattle died of DD than RHF. Although death loss from RHF was relatively minor, the occurrence of RHF in feedlot cattle is noteworthy for 2 reasons: First, before the 1970s, RHF was only reported in cattle at altitudes over 2,130 m;3, 4, 9 therefore, a 2‐fold increase in RHF over a 12 year period in feedlots located at low (657 m) to moderate (1,145 m) elevations deserves attention. Second, although RHF occurred throughout the feeding period, half of all cases occurred after 19 weeks; this makes death loss from RHF particularly costly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cattle exposed to the hypobaric hypoxia of high altitude have a greater baseline risk of alveolar hypoxia and, consequently, are at greater risk of RHF than cattle at lower altitudes. Before the 1970s, RHF had only been reported in cattle at altitudes over 2,130 m3, 4; it has since been reported at lower altitudes, however. In 1974, a study of 4 US feedlots located at an altitude of 1,600 m reported the attack risk of RHF to be 2.85 cases per 10,000 cattle entering the feedlot 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lowlanders with a brisk hypoxic vasoconstriction traveling to high altitudes may also be exposed to the risk of right heart failure. This complication of high altitude exposure has been reported in high altitude cattle (85), infants of Chinese Han brought to high altitudes in Tibet (208), Indian soldiers transported to high altitude borders with China (3) and occasional Europeans travelling to the South American altiplano (98). …”
Section: Exercise In Hypoxiamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The structural changes in small pulmonary arteries and veins appear to reflect this genetically based and adaptive process [3][4][5] in humans and animals. Excessive hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, and thus susceptibility to develop a right heart failure within weeks at high altitude, was first described in Colorado cattle [6]. Indian soldiers stationed at an altitude between 5,800-6,700 m [7] and Han infants in Lhasa [8] develop severe congestive right heart failure within weeks or months after arrival at high altitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%