2016
DOI: 10.1002/hep.28732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing to an end mother‐to‐child transmission of hepatitis B: A role for quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In analogy to this, as per 2016 data, access to HBV DNA measurement remained limited and unaffordable in most resource-limited and high-prevalence regions (US$100-$400 per test). 25 Likewise, a cost effectiveness study from 2016 estimated that the use of HBV DNA as compared to qHBsAg costs approximately USD $20,000 more per infection prevented. 22 A more recent cost effectiveness study highlights that the PAP-VL approach is only cost-effective in 26% of low-and middle-income countries due to high diagnostic cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In analogy to this, as per 2016 data, access to HBV DNA measurement remained limited and unaffordable in most resource-limited and high-prevalence regions (US$100-$400 per test). 25 Likewise, a cost effectiveness study from 2016 estimated that the use of HBV DNA as compared to qHBsAg costs approximately USD $20,000 more per infection prevented. 22 A more recent cost effectiveness study highlights that the PAP-VL approach is only cost-effective in 26% of low-and middle-income countries due to high diagnostic cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our NHS Healthcare Trust, the equivalent estimated costs for qualitative HBeAg, qHBsAg and HBV DNA are USD $4.6, $8.8 and $55.9, respectively. In analogy to this, as per 2016 data, access to HBV DNA measurement remained limited and unaffordable in most resource‐limited and high‐prevalence regions (US$100–$400 per test) 25 . Likewise, a cost effectiveness study from 2016 estimated that the use of HBV DNA as compared to qHBsAg costs approximately USD $20,000 more per infection prevented 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information will be useful in assessing the clinical utility of HCV qualitative versus quantitative RNA assays and optimizing the development of future HCV RDTs for HCVcAg detection, including as a one-step diagnostic strategy in a range of higher prevalence settings. A quantitative HBsAg test is currently under evaluation as a potentially simplified alternative strategy to ascertain high levels of viraemia, rather than a test for HBeAg or HBV DNA [50]. …”
Section: Diagnostic Innovations and Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%