Social Networking and Community Behavior Modeling
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-444-4.ch011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing Qualitative and Quantitative Data Together

Abstract: In this chapter, the authors investigate the issue of gathering network-related social data by means of both qualitative and quantitative methodology. An overview of the most relevant visual approaches such as network pictures and different kinds of network maps (“paper and pencil”, “paper, pen, and tokens,” and “digital network maps”) will be given, including an example of a migration study in which a network survey was carried out with the aid of the software program VennMaker. Finally, the authors discuss t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ego‐centric maps of social networks were predominantly used as prompts to define a range of supportive alters (Hogan et al., 2007) and generate a wider narrative around those involved in the support generation and mechanisms behind the support mobilization (Gamper et al., 2011). The ego‐centric maps were created during the interview using A3 paper and marker pens—each indicated different alters’ nationality and country of residence (Gamper et al., 2011). The paper‐based method has been selected to ensure accessibility for every participant (Hogan et al., 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ego‐centric maps of social networks were predominantly used as prompts to define a range of supportive alters (Hogan et al., 2007) and generate a wider narrative around those involved in the support generation and mechanisms behind the support mobilization (Gamper et al., 2011). The ego‐centric maps were created during the interview using A3 paper and marker pens—each indicated different alters’ nationality and country of residence (Gamper et al., 2011). The paper‐based method has been selected to ensure accessibility for every participant (Hogan et al., 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La investigación adopta así un diseño de métodos mixtos (Teddlie y Tashakkori, 2006; Tashakkori y Teddlie, 2009; Onwuegbuzie y otros, 2009; Small, 2011;Creswell, 2013;Schensul y LeCompte, 2013;Schiazza, 2013;Domínguez y Hollstein, 2014;Plano-Clark y Creswell, 2014;Smith, 2016) que incluye observación sistemática y participante, entrevistas semiestructuradas, relevamiento genealógico, encuestas de redes sociales, georreferenciación y mapeo participativo (Tetamanti y otros, 2018). Específicamente, la combinación de las técnicas clásicas de la etnografía con desarrollos cuantitativos como el análisis de redes sociales (ARS en adelante) recupera los planteos de Bernard (2006), Scheibelhofer (2008), Hollstein (2011), Gamper et al (2012) y Bellotti (2015), quienes proponen la necesidad de situar los resultados del ARS en contextos culturales específicos, vinculando las estrategias rutinarias de la gente con patrones cambiantes de organización social.…”
Section: Articulando Metodologías Y Escalas De Análisisunclassified
“…In this paper we make use of data of the LISS (Longitudinal Internet 2 There are many excellent alternative programs that make use of visualisations to facilitate personal network data collection in on-and offline settings, including EgoNet/EgoWeb (McCarty and Govindaramanujam, 2005), Venn-Maker (Gamper et al, 2012), NetworkCanvas (Hogan et al, 2019;Network Canvas, 2016), OpenEddi (Eddens et al, 2017), and GENSI-spinoff GENTLE (Krause and Jeronimus, 2019).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%