Bringing nations in: Some methodological and conceptual issues in connecting feminisms with nationhood and nationalisms

Abstract

The recent explosion of case studies about women's involvements in national projects reveals considerable diversity ranging from hostility and alienation, to affiliation or participation. Feminist analysis is just starting to explore the causes and effects of such diversity, however, since a single, common relationship usually was theorized between 'gender' and 'nation'. This article addresses some methodological and conceptual issues concerning the systematic comparison of these diverse relationships. It is argued that comparison is required to explain 'linkages between ideologies, religions and conflicts' from a gendered perspective and to incorporate the wide variety of women's experiences regarding national projects.Especially significant in this diversity is that, while national projects in 'the West' are rarely a site for women's liberation and most 'western' feminists are alienated from nationalism, globally women are more often mobilized by national projects than any other form of politics (Bystydzienski 1992). Moreover, some women's movements affiliate with national projects with positive outcomes. To understand how women's diverse involvements in national projects affect domestic and international conflicts, we need to identify factors producing this diversity in gender/ nation relationships. The article reports on a 'test' of six hypotheses concerning three modal cases drawn from a larger project eventually concerning thirty countries.---affiliated and unaffiliated feminisms, contextual methodology, gender justice, systematic comparison, women and nation/alism

Are (populist) radical right parties Männerparteien? Evidence from Bulgaria

“…Compared to other parties in parliament, radical right parties together with the ethnic Turkish party MRF are those that consistently include the smallest number of women in their parliamentary groups, apart from small parties that make a brief appearance. This finding is consistent with previous research arguing that nationalist and ethnic parties tend to include fewer women (Vickers 2006;Yuval-Davis 1997). By comparison, the current ruling party GERB has had over 33% female MPs in the last two parliaments.…”

Feminists really do count: the complexity of feminist methodologies

“…It is also the case within women"s studies and feminist journals. This is not to deny, of course, that methodological debate within feminism does occur (see, for example, Bacchi, 2005: Eveline et al, 2009Fonow and Cook, 2005;Henry, 2007;Power, 2004;McCall, 2005: Vickers, 2006. However, our findings suggest that in empirical articles where methodological justifications are given they refer predominantly to technical rather than epistemological issues.…”

Institutionalizing Insurgency

“…Contributors to IFjP have illuminated the tensions between the putatively inclusive language of nationalism and the raced-gendered hierarchies that mediate inclusion (Banerjee 2006;Das 2006;Vickers 2006). In an investigation of gender and nationalism in Israel, for example, Tami Jacoby (1999: 398) demonstrated that despite the persistence of egalitarian rhetoric, women tended to be 'included in nation building on the basis of their familial and biological functions as mothers of soldiers and ideological appendages of male leaders and fighters'.…”