2022
DOI: 10.1111/aswp.12275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing Indonesia into the global welfare regime debate: A literature review and future research agenda

Abstract: Since the publication of Esping-Andersen's (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, it has dominated comparative social policy debates and proved invaluable advances in developing a comprehensive framework for welfare state modeling. Despite some widely discussed limitations of Esping-Andersen's approach (Kühner, 2007;Scruggs & Allan, 2006), the welfare modeling business has been characterized by ongoing dynamism.With the expansion of welfare structures in many developing countries, additional welfare id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, it is notable that individuals in poverty often experience high levels of life satisfaction within the Global South territory (Recent empirical evidence is provided by Sulkers and Loos (2022). This evidence reinforces Veenhoven's (2005) theory that individuals can experience happiness and contribute to others even in challenging and unpredictable circumstances, which frequently characterise Global South welfare regimes (Yuda and K€ uhner, 2023). This disparity underscores the opportunity to revisit the fundamental question of what constitutes well-being within the context of the Global South.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, it is notable that individuals in poverty often experience high levels of life satisfaction within the Global South territory (Recent empirical evidence is provided by Sulkers and Loos (2022). This evidence reinforces Veenhoven's (2005) theory that individuals can experience happiness and contribute to others even in challenging and unpredictable circumstances, which frequently characterise Global South welfare regimes (Yuda and K€ uhner, 2023). This disparity underscores the opportunity to revisit the fundamental question of what constitutes well-being within the context of the Global South.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Since Esping-Andersen (1990) introduced the conceptual framework for welfare state regimes in Western countries, scholars have proposed different welfare models or approaches to conceptualise other welfare arrangements worldwide. In the Global South context, scholars have also adopted business models to conceptualise regional social policy arrangements (Yuda and K€ uhner, 2023). These models highlight the importance of the community and its social responsibilities in the management of well-being within this region.…”
Section: State-market-community Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes include economic growth and the expanding division of labour (Cruz-Martínez, 2017; Öktem, 2020). This argument may be relevant during the New Order period, with the introduction of various kinds of social security programmes such as Asuransi Sosial Angkatan Bersenjata, Insurance for Indonesian Armed Forces (ASABRI), Tabungan Asuransi Pegawai Negeri, Insurance Savings for Civil Servants (TASPEN), Jaminan Sosial Tenaga Kerja, Social Insurance for Private Sector Workers (JAMSOSTEK) and Badan Penyelenggara Dana Pemeliharaan Kesehatan, Health Care Fund Administering Agency (BPDPK), whose transformation into Asuransi Kesehatan, Health Insurance (ASKES) in 1992 occurred amid high economic growth (Yuda & Kühner, 2022).…”
Section: Institutionalisation Of National Social Security In Indonesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars studying the region trace the origins of welfare system reforms in the Global South back to the decade following the 1998 economic crisis, when a number of new institutions and policies expanded the role of government in a minimal welfare provision in multiple directions (cf. Yuda & Kühner, 2022; Koehler et al, 2021, for an overview). Moreover, as existing literature shows, welfare reform initiatives have presented significant societal obstacles in developing nations (Cruz-Martínez, 2017; Lavers & Hickey, 2016; Öktem, 2020), given that welfare state institutions were originally established for starkly dissimilar economic and social frameworks (Wood, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing specifically on the Indonesian case, this paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research on welfare stereotypes and stigma (Dukelow et al, 2022). To our knowledge, this topic has not yet been explored in relation to conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs, particularly in Southeast Asia as emerging welfare capitalism (Sumarto, 2020a; Yuda, 2023; Yuda et al, 2022; Yuda & Kühner, 2022). Accordingly, our paper outlines its objectives, which include examining the effects of CCT on impoverished families, exploring their attitudes towards these programs in response to stereotyping, and considering the implications of such stereotypes for the claim motivation of claimants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%