1986
DOI: 10.4310/jdg/1214440116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brill-Noether-Petri without degenerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
196
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
196
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As in Sect. 2, and following [11], it follows that there is a rank 2 vector bundle E on S with det E = L, c 2 (E) = k + 1, and h 0 (E) = k + 2. The zero set of a generic section of E is a generic member of a g 1 k+1 of a generic curve X ∈| L |.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As in Sect. 2, and following [11], it follows that there is a rank 2 vector bundle E on S with det E = L, c 2 (E) = k + 1, and h 0 (E) = k + 2. The zero set of a generic section of E is a generic member of a g 1 k+1 of a generic curve X ∈| L |.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Recall from [11] that if S is a K 3 surface endowed with a ample line bundle L such that L generates Pic S and L 2 = 2g − 2, the smooth members C ∈| L | are of genus g and generic in the sense of Brill-Noether, so that in particular they have the same Clifford index as a generic curve. Hence Conjecture 1 predicts that their syzygies vanish as stated in Conjecture 3.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let S be an Enriques surface, and let L be a line-bundle on , we can assume that for general (C, A) in W, |A| is base-point free. It thus makes sense to study the associated Lazarsfeld-Mukai vector bundles, F C,A and E C,A (see [Laz86]). …”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the work of Lazarsfeld and Tyurin [10,13], for any base-point free line-bundle A on C ∈ |mH|, there is defined a rank-2 vector bundle E C,A by…”
Section: Lemma 21 Suppose C ∈ |L| Is a Smooth Curve Of Gonality K Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1986, it was proved by Lazarsfeld [10] that if the linear system |L| on a K3 surface S doesn't contain non-reduced or reducible curves, then dim W r d (C) = ρ(g, r, d) for general C ∈ |L|. Knutsen [9] proved that the only cases of exceptional curves (i.e., curves C satisfying Cliff(C) < gon(C)−2) on K3 surfaces are the Donagi-Morrison example [3, (2.2)] and the generalised ELMS example (a generalisation of [4,Theorem 4.3] presented in Knutsen's article, see "Generalised ELMS examples").…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%