2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bright single-mode RR Lyrae stars: Matching Gaia EDR3 with pulsation and evolutionary models

Abstract: We combine observed metallicity, optical, and infrared magnitudes with evolutionary and pulsation models to derive average luminosities for 156 single-mode RR Lyrae stars. These luminosities are compared with those obtained from the Gaia EDR3 parallaxes and are found to be in excellent agreement with the high accuracy subsample (62 stars, with relative parallax errors of less than 2%). With the temperature and metallicity scale used, no parallax shift seems to be necessary when α-enhanced evolutionary models a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We neglected 𝛼-enhancement. As stated by Kovacs & Karamiqucham (2021), the effect of 𝛼-enhancement on periods has an order of magnitude of 10 −3 only, hence has little influence on the results of modeling.…”
Section: Grid Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We neglected 𝛼-enhancement. As stated by Kovacs & Karamiqucham (2021), the effect of 𝛼-enhancement on periods has an order of magnitude of 10 −3 only, hence has little influence on the results of modeling.…”
Section: Grid Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Masses predicted by the evolution theory are around 10-20% higher than those predicted by the pulsation theory (e.g., Keller 2008). In the case of RR Lyrae stars, Kovacs & Karamiqucham (2021) combined pulsation modeling with evolutionary tracks for single RR Lyrae stars to derive luminosities, which were later compared with estimations based on the Gaia EDR3 data, and led to an agreement between the two methods.…”
Section: Comparison With Evolution Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the single parameter (i.e., period) dependence of the gravity is very strong, the final formula also depends on the parameter coverage of the models. The following formula was derived from the models of Kovacs & Karamiqucham (2021b) covering the RR Lyrae parameter space and combining solar-scaled models with overall heavy element contents of Z = 0.0008 and 0.001: log g = 2.48 − 1.27 log P 0 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%