1983
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/204.1.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bright radio sources at 178 MHz: flux densities, optical identifications and the cosmological evolution of powerful radio galaxies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
643
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 702 publications
(659 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
643
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The new sample, hereafter referred to as the z0.1 sample, consists of all radio-loud AGN with visible structure beyond the nucleus lying in the redshift range 0.01 z 0.2 from two flux-limited radio surveys: the 3CRR survey (Laing et al 1983) and the subsample of the 2Jy survey (Wall & Peacock 1985;Tadhunter et al 1993) defined by Dicken et al (2008). The initial sample contained 38 3CRR and 22 2Jy sources, but five sources were excluded.…”
Section: The Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new sample, hereafter referred to as the z0.1 sample, consists of all radio-loud AGN with visible structure beyond the nucleus lying in the redshift range 0.01 z 0.2 from two flux-limited radio surveys: the 3CRR survey (Laing et al 1983) and the subsample of the 2Jy survey (Wall & Peacock 1985;Tadhunter et al 1993) defined by Dicken et al (2008). The initial sample contained 38 3CRR and 22 2Jy sources, but five sources were excluded.…”
Section: The Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the RLQs are selected based on optically thin extended emission, which means that the sample selection should be largely orientation independent. The RGs were selected from the low frequency, (178 or 151 MHz; orientation independent) radio samples of the 3CRR (Laing et al 1983), 6CE (Eales 1985), 7CRS (Willott et al 1998) and TOOT surveys (Hill & Rawlings 2003). For the 6C objects the redshifts are taken from Best et al (1996), Rawlings et al (2001) and Inskip et al (2005), and for the 6C* and TOOT objects from Jarvis et al (2001b) and Vardoulaki et al (2010), respectively.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are upper limits only in the sense that there is an unknown contribution from non-thermal emission. All of these sources (except 3C 236) have weak radio cores, so that from the observed correlation between radio and X-ray nuclear emission (paper I) we would Redshifts are taken from Laing et al (1983). An H in column 3 indicates that the data come from the ROSAT HRI; a P indicates the PSPC.…”
Section: X-ray Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%