2017
DOI: 10.1090/proc/13828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brieskorn spheres bounding rational balls

Abstract: Fintushel and Stern showed that the Brieskorn sphere Σ(2, 3, 7) bounds a rational homology ball, while its non-trivial Rokhlin invariant obstructs it from bounding an integral homology ball. It is known that their argument can be modified to show that the figure-eight knot is rationally slice, and we use this fact to provide the first additional examples of Brieskorn spheres that bound rational homology balls but not integral homology balls: the families Σ(2, 4n + 1, 12n + 5) and Σ(3, 3n + 1, 12n + 5) for n od… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exceptional Dehn surgery at slope (0, 1) on the figure-of-eight knot K 0 leads to a remarkable manifold Σ Y found in [39] in the context of 3-dimensional integral homology spheres smoothly bounding integral homology balls. Apart from its topological importance, we find that some of its coverings are associated to already discovered ICs and those coverings have the same fundamental group π 1 (Σ Y ).…”
Section: Akbulut's Manifold σ Ymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Exceptional Dehn surgery at slope (0, 1) on the figure-of-eight knot K 0 leads to a remarkable manifold Σ Y found in [39] in the context of 3-dimensional integral homology spheres smoothly bounding integral homology balls. Apart from its topological importance, we find that some of its coverings are associated to already discovered ICs and those coverings have the same fundamental group π 1 (Σ Y ).…”
Section: Akbulut's Manifold σ Ymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We will start with our friend T 1 and arrive at a few standard 3-manifolds of historic importance, the Poincaré homology sphere [alias the Brieskorn sphere Σ(2, 3, 5)], the Brieskorn sphere Σ(2, 3, 7) and a Seifert fibered toroidal manifold Σ . Then we introduce the 3-manifold Σ Y resulting from 0-surgery on the figure-of-eight knot [39]. Later in this section, we will show how to use the {3, 5, 3} Coxeter lattice and surgery to arrive at a hyperbolic 3-manifold Σ 120e of maximal symmetry whose several coverings (and related POVMs) are close to the ones of the trefoil knot [40].…”
Section: A Few Dehn Fillings and Their Povmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 1.3. The figure-eight satisfies the hypotheses of Theorem 1.2 by [FS84] (see also [AL18, Section 3] and [HM17, Theorem 1.7]). More generally, the genus one knots K n with n positive full twists in one band and n negative full twists in the other band, n odd, also satisfy the hypotheses of Theorem 1.2; see Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Understanding which rational homology 3-spheres (QS 3 s) bound rational homology 4-balls (QB 4 s) is a widely explored open question among Kirby's list of problems (Problem 4.5 in [1]). Certain classifications of QS 3 s bounding QB 4 s do exist (e.g., lens spaces [17], certain small Seifert fibered spaces [15], some Dehn surgeries on knots [3], and some Brieskorn spheres [4], [10], [6]), but the question at large is far from resolved. In [4], Akbulut-Larson used the fact that 0-surgery on the figure-eight knot bounds a rational homology circle (QS 1 × B 3 ) to construct infinite families of Brieskorn spheres that bound QB 4 s. Their construction relies in part on the following lemma, which Akbulut-Larson proved for the case of 0-surgery on the figure-eight knot (and, more generally, rationally slice knots).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%