2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-017-3040-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Report: Meeting the Needs of Medically Hospitalized Adults with Autism: A Provider and Patient Toolkit

Abstract: In an effort to meet the needs of adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) while hospitalized, a team of experts and providers from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), MGH for Children as well as parents of individuals with ASD was sparked in 2013. This became a multidisciplinary collaborative, the MGH Autism Care Collaborative, to improve adult care for inpatients with ASD. The collaborative was created with three goals in mind: (1) to educate internal medicine adult inpatient providers and staff on the u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, participants reported being somewhat dissatisfied with the care they received in the ED. Initial support has been found for research-based curriculum for clinicians on caring for individuals with ASD in the hospital environment (Carter et al, 2017); however, existing tools tend to focus on children and individuals with ID. The extent to which these efforts target adults with ASD without caregiver input is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, participants reported being somewhat dissatisfied with the care they received in the ED. Initial support has been found for research-based curriculum for clinicians on caring for individuals with ASD in the hospital environment (Carter et al, 2017); however, existing tools tend to focus on children and individuals with ID. The extent to which these efforts target adults with ASD without caregiver input is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource review: Existing literature described the process of creating toolkits but lacked evidence of ongoing review and responsiveness to the contemporary needs of clinical educators. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] e task force prioritized creation of a transparent resource review process to establish a mechanism for the addition of new resources and to articulate to contributors and users how each resource was reviewed. e evaluation criteria are broad to capture relevant content that is evidenced based as well as content created by CIs based on their personal clinical teaching experiences.…”
Section: Profile Of the Current CI Toolkitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies were excluded if they involved the development or consideration of relevant interventions but did not evaluate these (e.g., Carter et al, 2017). In addition, studies were excluded if their focus was not specific to autism and/or it was not possible to extract data pertaining to the outcomes of the intervention for autistic participants or their caregivers (e.g., Drake et al, 2012).…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%