2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-016-2785-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Report: Joint Attention and Information Processing in Children with Higher Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders

Abstract: Theory suggests that information processing during joint attention may be atypical in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This hypothesis was tested in a study of school-aged children with higher functioning ASD and groups of children with symptoms of ADHD or typical development. The results indicated that the control groups displayed significantly better recognition memory for pictures studied in an initiating joint attention (IJA) rather than responding to joint attention (RJA) condition. This effe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
71
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
71
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism for this may involve the neural systems and functions that Senju & Johnson () have described for the eye‐contact effect (Mundy, ). The eye‐contact effect refers to the changes in arousal and cognitive processing that occur when a child or adult perceives that they are the object of the direct gaze and attention of another person (e.g., Conty et al ., ; Edwards et al ., ; Mundy et al ., ). Senju & Johnson () proposed that a fast track modulator network composed of the superior colliculus, pulvinar, and amygdala mediates the eye‐contact effect.…”
Section: Joint Attention Precursors and Early Biomarkers Of Asdmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mechanism for this may involve the neural systems and functions that Senju & Johnson () have described for the eye‐contact effect (Mundy, ). The eye‐contact effect refers to the changes in arousal and cognitive processing that occur when a child or adult perceives that they are the object of the direct gaze and attention of another person (e.g., Conty et al ., ; Edwards et al ., ; Mundy et al ., ). Senju & Johnson () proposed that a fast track modulator network composed of the superior colliculus, pulvinar, and amygdala mediates the eye‐contact effect.…”
Section: Joint Attention Precursors and Early Biomarkers Of Asdmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Accordingly, the problem in the motivation to orient to and attend to faces that hypothetically leads to problems in joint attention development (e.g., Dawson et al ., ) may alternatively be described in terms of a diminution of the eye‐contact effect, or a lack of cognitive arousal to being the object of others’ attention (Mundy et al ., ). Optical imaging and EEG methods allow for tests of this hypothesis.…”
Section: Joint Attention Precursors and Early Biomarkers Of Asdmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…JA refers to a social exchange in which a child coordinates attention with a social partner or aspect of the environment by the acts of eye-gazing and pointing or other verbal or non-verbal indications. JA serves as a foundation for developing communicative competence and early social and cognitive skills [29]. Early interventions that facilitate JA are promising because these strategies increase children’s opportunities to learn from their environment and change their developmental trajectories [10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to gestures, these children might exhibit pacing, hand-flapping or clapping as well as head shaking (Aldaqre, Schuwerk, Daum, Sodian, & Paulus, 2016;Dimitrova, Özçalışkan, & Adamson, 2016). A core nonverbal deficit in children with ASD is limited joint attention behaviors (Mundy, Kim, McIntyre, Lerro, & Jarrold, 2016;Murza, Schwartz, Hahs-Vaughn, & Nye, 2016). Joint attention involves coordinated and mutual attention between two people toward an object or event through eye gaze, pointing or showing (Kasari, Gulsrud, Freeman, Paparella, & Hellemann, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%