2017
DOI: 10.22328/2079-5343-2017-1-6-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Recommendations for Authors on the Preparation and Design of Scientific Articles in Magazines Indexed in International Databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Kirillova rightly notes: "not a single scientific work can be started without a preliminary study and analysis of research carried out earlier on the chosen topic or presently being in progress. The results of such an analysis of publications on the topic of research are reflected both directly in research articles and are published in the form of regular independent reviews" [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Kirillova rightly notes: "not a single scientific work can be started without a preliminary study and analysis of research carried out earlier on the chosen topic or presently being in progress. The results of such an analysis of publications on the topic of research are reflected both directly in research articles and are published in the form of regular independent reviews" [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the quality of peer review, the editorial team of the 'Economy of Region' (Ekonomika Regiona, ER) agreed (1) to analyse the rejection rate for submissions from 2016 to 2018, (2) to examine the reasons for rejection, and (3) to compare, for each manuscript, the opinions of two reviewers who had reviewed it.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, comments and recommendations from reviewers contribute to improving the reviewed contributions. 1 The increasing number of submissions encourages editors to keep refining the process of peer review, and a variety of forms of peer review (closed, open, single-blind, double-blind, 2,3 postopen-peer-reviewing, 4 or hybrid open peer review 5,6 ) aim to make the process more transparent and to improve the quality of a journal's content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%