Brief Pain Inventory--Italian Version

Caraceni, Augusto; Mendoza, Tito R.; Mencaglia, Emanuela; Baratella, Claudio; Edwards, Katherine R.; Forjaz, María João; Martini, Cinzia; Serlin, Ronald C.; Conno, F. De; Cleeland, Charles S.

doi:10.1037/t52027-000

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These findings provide compelling evidence of the BPI-Bengali's robust test-retest reliability, demonstrating that patients' responses were consistent over a short interval. This aligns with previous research conducted in diverse cultural contexts, reinforcing the instrument's reliability (24)(25)(26) .…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 88%

Psychometric evaluation of the Bengali brief pain inventory in a sample of Bangladeshi cancer patients

Rahaman,

Khatun

2024

Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pain is a common complain among oncology patients, and success of its management requires accurate assessment. However, the status of pain treatment in Bangladesh is largely undocumented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Bengali version of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-Bengali) in a Bangladeshi sample of cancer patients. BPI-Bengali and the Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients Revised (QSC-R 23) were administered to a convenience sample of 60 adult oncology patients receiving pain treatment. Cronbach alpha coefficients were 0.89 and 0.94 for the severity and interference items respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the test-retest stability were 0.65 (p<0.01) for the pain intensity scale and 0.88 (p<0.01) for the pain interference scale. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) yielded two components, indicating pain severity and interference clusters by explaining 75% of the variance. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated the model as moderate fit to the data (CFI=0.89, RMSEA=0.16). Convergent validity of the pain severity and interference was demonstrated by significant correlations with stress level (r=0.67, p<0.01), (r=0.66, p<0.01). The findings of this study support the psychometric properties of Bengali BPI among cancer population in terms of validity, reliability and factor structure. Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 33(1): 99-108, 2024 (January)

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 88%

Psychometric evaluation of the Bengali brief pain inventory in a sample of Bangladeshi cancer patients

Rahaman,

Khatun

2024

Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Also, like others who have validated the BPI, we also have had to exclude ''sleep'' as an item because of poor factor loadings. 16,29 Coefficient alphas are used to identify if there are any errors during measurement. In our study, we have observed coefficient alphas that were in the range of those values calculated for BPI validations for other countries (Table 3).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Clinicians and researchers wanting to use the WBPQ should be aware that, like the BPI, 19,29 there are no suitable methods for dealing with missing values in the WBPQ. However, we overcame this problem by using interviewers to administer the questionnaire to the patients, and we had no missing values.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Items that significantly compromised the underlying construct of a subscale (that is, the scale alpha value rose when the item was deleted) were removed. 29 To determine whether patients had difficulty using the 11-point rating scale used in the pain intensity subscale of the questionnaires, we also determined how many patients, within each language group, rated the intensity of their average pain, least pain, or pain now greater than their worst pain. 16…”

Section: Statistical Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire in a Multilingual South African Population

Mphahlele

Mitchell

Kamerman

2008

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessment of pain intensity and its effect on quality of life is important for proper management of pain, but no validated pain assessment tools that assess pain intensity and the interference pain has on daily life are available in indigenous South African languages. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate translated versions of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire (WBPQ) in South African HIV-positive patients. The WBPQ was translated into three indigenous South African languages, Setswana, isiZulu, and Xitsonga. We interviewed 452 ambulatory HIV-positive patients (327 urban and 125 rural patients) between the ages of 20 and 76 years old. Factor analysis to assess construct validity identified a two-factor structure (pain intensity and pain interference) for the isiZulu (n=132), Xitsonga (n=125), and Setswana (n=66) versions of the WBPQ, whereas a three-factor structure (pain intensity, mood interference, and activity interference) was identified for the English (completed by English second-language speakers, n=129) version of the WBPQ. Cronbach alphas, calculated to assess the reliability of the pain intensity and pain interference scales, were greater than 0.70 for all scales in all four versions of the WBPQ, showing internal consistency within the dimensions. These results provide evidence of validity for an easily administered questionnaire, which assesses pain intensity and pain interference, in three indigenous South African languages, and for English second-language speakers, in a population of South African HIV-positive patients.

show abstract

“…The VAS when relaxed and after slight-moderate strain was required, considering the parameters of the latter expressed as ''Quality of Life'' in the ''Brief Pain Inventory'', modified Italian version [1].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disc coablation and epidural injection of steroids: a comparison of strategies in the treatment of mechanical spinal discogenic pain

Reverberi¹,

Bottoli²,

Pennini³

et al.

Advanced Peripheral Nerve Surgery and Minimal Invasive Spinal Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryIn this study two strategies in the treatment of Mechanical Spinal Discogenic Pain have been compared: Disc Coablation and Epidural Injection of Steroids.In 2003 50 patients treated with one or two epidural injections have been selected ''ad random'' and 50 patients treated with disc coablation.Comparison of the data indicated an improvement of average VAS when relaxed for both groups ðp < 0:01Þ, while after slightmoderate strain, this value was significant only after coablation ðp < 0:001Þ. Finally, average VAS was clearly lower ðp < 0:01Þ after coablation as compared to epidural injections.

show abstract

Brief Pain Inventory--Italian Version

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Psychometric evaluation of the Bengali brief pain inventory in a sample of Bangladeshi cancer patients

Psychometric evaluation of the Bengali brief pain inventory in a sample of Bangladeshi cancer patients

Validation of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire in a Multilingual South African Population

Disc coablation and epidural injection of steroids: a comparison of strategies in the treatment of mechanical spinal discogenic pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About