Brief intervention on maternal smoking: a randomized controlled trial

Yılmaz, Gonca; Karacan, Can Demir; Yöney, Aysel; Yilmaz, Taygan

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00570.x

Cited by 47 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ten of the studies enrolled healthy children, 13,18,21,22,24,26,29,30,33,34 five of the studies enrolled asthmatic children, 23,25,27,31,32 and three of the studies enrolled children visiting hospitals or pediatric clinics. 19,20,28 …”

Section: Age Of Childrenmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nurses were the intervention providers in 6 studies, 19,20,22,25,30,33 physicians were providers in 3 studies, 26,28,29 research assistants were providers in 7 studies, 13,18,23,24,27,31,32 and clinic…”

Section: Program Providersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Interventions included some of the following components: self-help materials (12 studies 13,18,[20][21][22]24,26,[29][30][31]33,34 ), face-toface counseling (16 studies [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] ), telephone counseling (6 studies 13,[18][19][20]32,34 ), cessation medications (2 studies 24,28 ), and cotinine feedback (1 study 32,39 20,24,32 ).…”

Section: Intervention Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of these, 403 articles concerned topics not relevant to this study, and 18 met the inclusion criteria for this review. 13,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The trials were conducted in the United States, China, Norway, Scotland, Finland, Italy, and Australia between 1987 and 2010. Forty-seven studies were excluded for the following reasons: quit rates were not reported or were not reported separately for intervention and control groups, or numbers of participants were not reported (24 studies ; the study design was not a controlled trial [11 studies [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69] ]), the interventions were not aimed at parents of young children (9 studies [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] ); the reporting period was less than 1 month (1 study 79 ); a protocol only was reported (1 study 80 ); the report was not in English (1 study 81 ).…”

Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Parental Smoking Cessation to Protect Young Children:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: Young children can be protected from much of the harm from tobacco smoke exposure if their parents quit smoking. Some researchers encourage parents to quit for their children's benefit, but the evidence for effectiveness of such approaches is mixed. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the effects of interventions that encourage parental cessation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Controlled trials published before April 2011 that targeted smoking parents of infants or young children, encouraged parents to quit smoking for their children's benefit, and measured parental quit rates were included. Study quality was assessed. Relative risks and risk differences were calculated by using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. RESULTS: Eighteen trials were included. Interventions took place in hospitals, pediatric clinical settings, well-baby clinics, and family homes. Quit rates averaged 23.1% in the intervention group and 18.4% in the control group. The interventions successfully increased the parental quit rate. Subgroups with significant intervention benefits were children aged 4 to 17 years, interventions whose primary goal was cessation, interventions that offered medications, and interventions with high follow-up rates (>80%). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to achieve cessation among parents, for the sake of the children, provide a worthwhile addition to the arsenal of cessation approaches, and can help protect vulnerable children from harm due to tobacco smoke exposure. However, most parents do not quit, and additional strategies to protect children are needed.

show abstract

Section: Age Of Childrenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Program Providersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Intervention Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Parental Smoking Cessation to Protect Young Children:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(For discussion of a stagesequential view of mediation, see Collins, Graham, & Flaherty, 1998. ) This type of research is wide ranging, with examples including maternal interventions aimed at maternal and child health and well-being (e.g., Yilmaz, Karacan, Yoney, & Yilmaz, 2006), early childhood socialization (e.g., Hustedt & Raver, 2002), and the prevention of cognitive decline among Alzheimer's patients (e.g., Arkin, 2007).…”

Section: Use and Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Testing the degree of cross-sectional and longitudinal dependence between two discrete dynamic processes.

Flaherty¹

2008

Developmental Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Developmental research often involves studying change across 2 or more processes or constructs simultaneously. A natural question in this work is whether change in these 2 processes is related or independent. Associative latent transition analysis (ALTA) was designed to test hypotheses about the degree to which change in 2 discrete latent variables is related. The ALTA model is a type of latent class model, which is a categorical latent variable model based on categorical indicators. In the ALTA approach, level and change on 1 variable is predicted by level and change in another. Two types of hypotheses are discussed: (a) broad hypotheses of dependence between the 2 discrete latent variables and (b) targeted hypotheses comparing specific patterns of change between levels of the discrete variables. Both types of hypotheses are tested via nested model comparisons. Analyses of relations between psychological state and substance use illustrate the model. Recent psychological state and recent substance use were found to be associated crosssectionally and longitudinally, implying that change in recent substance use was related to change in recent psychological state. Keywordsdevelopmental methods; analysis of change; latent class analysis; categorical data Developmental research often involves studying change across two or more processes or constructs simultaneously. A natural question concerning two changing constructs is whether change in those two processes is related? That is, as development (or more broadly, change) in one domain progresses, is development in another domain related? For example, are changes in one domain of cognitive development associated with changes in another? It is possible that both cognitive domains are developing independently, or that change in one domain spurs change in the other. Cross-sectional research cannot reveal temporal effects like those just described. The example presented here examines whether changes in recent psychological state predict changes in recent substance use, but the methods are applicable broadly to research examining change in two constructs.Research on associated change may focus on broad patterns of association between the two constructs or on more narrowly focused associations. As an example of a broad hypothesis, consider examining whether change across all levels of substance use is associated with (or predicted by) change across levels or states of psychological state. One could think of this as conceptually similar to an omnibus F test in an analysis of variance where many possible patterns of differences can lead to a conclusion of some difference. In a context where two NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript dynamic processes are under study, one might think of this broad hypothesis as whether overall there are any associations in change and stability between the constructs.In contrast, hypotheses about associations between two changing constructs may also be quite precise. For example, one could examine diff...

show abstract

Interventions by Health Care Professionals Who Provide Routine Child Health Care to Reduce Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Children

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IMPORTANCE Reducing child exposure to tobacco smoke is a public health priority. Guidelines recommend that health care professionals in child health settings should address tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) in children. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of interventions delivered by health care professionals who provide routine child health care in reducing TSE in children. DATA SOURCES A secondary analysis of 57 trials included in a 2014 Cochrane review and a subsequent extended search was performed. Controlled trials (published through June 2015) of interventions that focused on reducing child TSE, with no restrictions placed on who delivered the interventions, were identified. Secondary data extraction was performed in August 2015. STUDY SELECTION Controlled trials of routine child health care delivered by health care professionals (physicians, nurses, medical assistants, health educators, and dieticians) that addressed the outcomes of interest (TSE reduction in children and parental smoking behaviors) were eligible for inclusion in this review and meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Study details and quality characteristics were independently extracted by 2 authors. If outcome measures were sufficiently similar, meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model by DerSimonian and Laird. Otherwise, the results were described narratively. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measure was reduction in child TSE. Secondary outcomes of interest were parental smoking cessation, parental smoking reduction, and maternal postpartum smoking relapse prevention. RESULTS Sixteen studies met the selection criteria. Narrative analysis of the 6 trials that measured child TSE indicated no intervention effects relative to comparison groups. Similarly, meta-analysis of 9 trials that measured parental smoking cessation demonstrated no overall intervention effect (n = 6399) (risk ratio 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74-1.50; P = .78). Meta-analysis of the 3 trials that measured maternal postpartum smoking relapse prevention demonstrated a significant overall intervention effect (n = 1293) (risk ratio 1.53; 95% CI, 1.10-2.14; P = .01). High levels of study heterogeneity likely resulted from variability in outcome measures, length of follow up, intervention strategies, and unknown intervention fidelity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Interventions delivered by health care professionals who provide routine child health care may be effective in preventing maternal smoking relapse. Further research is required to improve the effectiveness of such interventions in reducing child TSE and increasing parental smoking cessation. The findings of this meta-analysis have policy and practice implications relating to interventions by routine pediatric health care professionals that aim to reduce child exposure to tobacco smoke.

show abstract

Brief intervention on maternal smoking: a randomized controlled trial

Cited by 47 publications

References 17 publications

Parental Smoking Cessation to Protect Young Children:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Parental Smoking Cessation to Protect Young Children:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Testing the degree of cross-sectional and longitudinal dependence between two discrete dynamic processes.

Interventions by Health Care Professionals Who Provide Routine Child Health Care to Reduce Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Children

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About