1974
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/52.2.599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Communication: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Cancer. IV. Correlation of Water Content With Tissue Relaxation Times23

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
16
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding follows the general observation reported several times by others that water content is a major factor governing T1 and T2 in tissues (Hazlewood et al 1969, Damadian 1971, Hollis et al 1973, Inch et al 1974, Saryan et al . 1974, Medina et al 1975, Braunschweiger et al .…”
Section: T I and T 2 Versus Fractional Tumour Water Contentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding follows the general observation reported several times by others that water content is a major factor governing T1 and T2 in tissues (Hazlewood et al 1969, Damadian 1971, Hollis et al 1973, Inch et al 1974, Saryan et al . 1974, Medina et al 1975, Braunschweiger et al .…”
Section: T I and T 2 Versus Fractional Tumour Water Contentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There is rapid hardening of tissues and also loss of water. T1 is highly dependent on the water content of the tissue, and thus T1 falls following fixation [44], however the relationship between T2 and water content does not have the same predictable effect [34]. Formalin molecules may form covalent and ionic bonds within tissues, predominantly with amino groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think that MR may be ideal for this purpose, because it has been shown to be sensitive to changes in tissues over time, for example, during differentiation, inflammation, and edema. 1,18,20,26,29 Moreover, MR images are able to demonstrate the infiltration of tissues into the implants as well as the materials' degradation over time in vivo. 17 Specifically, MR imaging can be helpful for the evaluation of the fusion zone within the cage and for the assessment of a sentinel sign at the anterior side of the segment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%