2007
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Communication: Human cranial variation fits iterative founder effect model with African origin

Abstract: Recent studies comparing craniometric and neutral genetic affinity matrices have concluded that, on average, human cranial variation fits a model of neutral expectation. While human craniometric and genetic data fit a model of isolation by geographic distance, it is not yet clear whether this is due to geographically mediated gene flow or human dispersal events. Recently, human genetic data have been shown to fit an iterative founder effect model of dispersal with an African origin, in line with the out-of-Afr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
142
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
12
142
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[Interestingly, the most divergent and genetically diverse clade was from South Africa, although Linz et al (58) eliminated this as an outlier in some analyses]. Even morphological variation of human crania supports a serial founder effect model OOA (59)(60)(61). In summary, multiple independent lines of genetic evidence thus support a serial founder effect mode of dispersal.…”
Section: Independent Evidence Of Out Of Africa Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Interestingly, the most divergent and genetically diverse clade was from South Africa, although Linz et al (58) eliminated this as an outlier in some analyses]. Even morphological variation of human crania supports a serial founder effect model OOA (59)(60)(61). In summary, multiple independent lines of genetic evidence thus support a serial founder effect mode of dispersal.…”
Section: Independent Evidence Of Out Of Africa Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the application of a population genetic approach has revealed that neutral evolutionary processes (i.e., drift and migration) can leave a strong signature on human phenotypic traits (e.g., Betti et al, 2009Betti et al, , 2010Weaver 2006a, 2006b;Manica et al 2007;Relethford 1994Relethford , 2002Relethford , 2004Roseman 2004;Roseman andWeaver 2004, 2007;Smith 2009Smith , 2011Strauss and Hubbe 2010;von Cramon-Taubadel and Lycett 2008;von Cramon-Taubadel 2009a, 2009bvon Cramon-Taubadel and Weaver 2009). Cranial shape variation in different human populations, in particular, tends to reflect the underlying neutral genetic pattern, to the point that cranial morphology can be used effectively to test for past demographic events, such as past migrations and the colonization of new regions (e.g., González-José et al 2001, 2002Hubbe et al 2010Hubbe et al , 2011Manica et al 2007;Pinhasi and von Cramon-Taubadel 2009;von Cramon-Taubadel and Pinhasi 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 2000s, improvements in DNA sequencing technology and genetic sampling of more present day human groups made it possible to accurately characterize the genetic diversity of groups from different regions of the world, and it became clear that within-group genetic diversity decreased predictably with increased geographic distance from subSaharan Africa (3,4). Subsequently, similar, albeit weaker, relationships were found between within-group variation in aspects of skeletal morphology (cranial, dental, and pelvic measurements) and distance from subSaharan Africa (5)(6)(7)(8). These results effectively settled the size vs. time debate, because it was hard to imagine how the observed geographic distribution of within-group diversity could have arisen without a recent range expansion of modern humans from Africa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%