2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23228
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief communication: An analysis of dental development in Pleistocene Homo using skeletal growth and chronological age

Abstract: This study provides a new interpretation of dental development in KNM-WT 15000 as primarily reflecting his faster rates of skeletal growth. While the two AMH specimens exhibit considerable individual variation, the Neanderthals exhibit delayed incisor development early and advanced molar development later in ontogeny.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(81 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Os1b shows a skeletal and dental development (Supplementary Table S1 ) that is more advanced than a modern fetus of the same gestational age, as derived from the present contribution. This evidence reinforces the hypothesis that developmental rates have varied through time 47 . Collectively, these findings support the idea that modern growth standards may be inadequate when analyzing archaeological remains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Os1b shows a skeletal and dental development (Supplementary Table S1 ) that is more advanced than a modern fetus of the same gestational age, as derived from the present contribution. This evidence reinforces the hypothesis that developmental rates have varied through time 47 . Collectively, these findings support the idea that modern growth standards may be inadequate when analyzing archaeological remains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Variations between skeletal, dental and chronological age have been observed through the whole Pleistocene 46 , 47 . Os1b shows a skeletal and dental development (Supplementary Table S1 ) that is more advanced than a modern fetus of the same gestational age, as derived from the present contribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, growth analysis based on annual marks is not only possible for trees. The methods of probabilistic age determination presented here could well be extended to study time series of growth marks in roots of perennial herbs [35], fish scales and otoliths, bivalve shells, corals, turtle scutes [36], bones of cervids and primates [37], and dental development data [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle of demographic uniformitarianism is well-accepted. Critics have questioned whether the use of the uniformitarian assumption is a form of 'self-fulfilling prophecy' [83] that prevents the possibility of identifying unusual or unrecorded demographic behaviour in the past, either because prehistoric populations lived in environments that have no modern analogue, or because there is greater variation across human biological and life-history parameters than is frequently supposed, particularly between Pleistocene and Holocene populations [84,85]. While this possibility cannot be rejected outright, the null hypothesis should be that reconstructions of prehistoric population dynamics and royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rstb Phil.…”
Section: Conclusion: Challenges and Lessons For The Use Of The Uniformentioning
confidence: 99%