2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1632613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the WTA-WTP Gap: Ownership, Bargaining, and the Endowment Effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-owners received a cash payment, and owners received a set of 49 Others have constructed theories that stand as alternatives to endowment theory and hinge on the psychological relationship between individuals and their possessions. Coren (2007) summarized the literature that develops and tests these sorts of theories. Evidence exists to support these theories, which are built on assumptions such as emotional attachment to possessions as alternatives to loss aversion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non-owners received a cash payment, and owners received a set of 49 Others have constructed theories that stand as alternatives to endowment theory and hinge on the psychological relationship between individuals and their possessions. Coren (2007) summarized the literature that develops and tests these sorts of theories. Evidence exists to support these theories, which are built on assumptions such as emotional attachment to possessions as alternatives to loss aversion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loewenstein and Kahneman (1991), for example, pointed out findings from Kahneman et al (1991) that suggested that pen owners were no more likely than non-pen-owners to rate pens highly on an attractiveness scale. In addition, the "instantaneous" nature of gaps seems to work against attachment theory, at least if it assumes that attachment requires some time to develop (Kahneman et al 1990(Kahneman et al , p. 1342; but see Coren 2007, who suggested that attachment might occur instantly).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%