Candidate Experience 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-08896-5_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the Scientist-Practitioner Gap: Einflussfaktoren auf die Bewerberakzeptanz bei neuen Technologien am Beispiel zeitversetzter Video-Interviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the digital interview procedure, we followed the process of Brenner et al (2016), common practices for digital interviews (Brenner, 2016;Schmerling, 2017), and suggestions provided during personal contact with Falko Brenner 2 (November 15th, 2016). To manage recordings of digital interviews, we used the video recording tool Clipchamp (www.clipchamp.com).…”
Section: Digital Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the digital interview procedure, we followed the process of Brenner et al (2016), common practices for digital interviews (Brenner, 2016;Schmerling, 2017), and suggestions provided during personal contact with Falko Brenner 2 (November 15th, 2016). To manage recordings of digital interviews, we used the video recording tool Clipchamp (www.clipchamp.com).…”
Section: Digital Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this post-application phase, recruitment activities are still crucial in retaining applicants and increasing the likelihood that they accept job offers (Highhouse, Lievens, & Sinar, 2003). An increasingly common recruitment activity in this phase are company presentation videos where hiring managers present themselves and the organization to applicants (Brenner, 2016). Such videos are particularly common before digital interviews (also known as asynchronous interviews, where applicants answer to questions by sending videos to the organization; Langer, König, & Krause, 2017) to enhance candidate experience and to inform applicants about who will evaluate their responses (Brenner, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%