2012
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the phenotypic and genetic data useful for integrated breeding through a data annotation using the Crop Ontology developed by the crop communities of practice

Abstract: The Crop Ontology (CO) of the Generation Challenge Program (GCP) (http://cropontology.org/) is developed for the Integrated Breeding Platform (IBP) (http://www.integratedbreeding.net/) by several centers of The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR): bioversity, CIMMYT, CIP, ICRISAT, IITA, and IRRI. Integrated breeding necessitates that breeders access genotypic and phenotypic data related to a given trait. The CO provides validated trait names used by the crop communities of practic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
106
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is reflected in MIAPPE in the section “Observed Variables”. Following the approach of the Crop Ontology platform [32, 33], we propose to describe the observed variables by three basic attributes: trait name, method, and scale. In this section, in addition to phenotypic variables (any plant characteristics that are measured in a phenotyping experiment), we also consider environmental variables, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is reflected in MIAPPE in the section “Observed Variables”. Following the approach of the Crop Ontology platform [32, 33], we propose to describe the observed variables by three basic attributes: trait name, method, and scale. In this section, in addition to phenotypic variables (any plant characteristics that are measured in a phenotyping experiment), we also consider environmental variables, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Plant Ontology (PO) community is continuously improving its structured term lists to include anatomical entities that reflect the organizing principle of the plant body, thereby enabling interspecific comparisons of gene expression, phenotypes and gene functions [52]. At the other end of the research spectrum, ecologists, agronomists and breeders are also codifying trait descriptions with the implementation of dedicated ontologies to integrate field observations and measurements across experimental sites and for different species, including crops [53,54]. As our understanding of the functional modules that govern plant growth and development improves, information formatted through studies such as this one, focusing on mutant phenotypes in one plant species, could eventually assist trait development efforts in another.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the Solanaceae Phenotype Ontology (SPTO) [17, 18], Plant Ontology (PO) [19, 20], Phenotypic Quality Ontology (PATO) [21, 22] and Trait Ontology (TO) [23] were used to identify plant-specific phenotypic information whereas Gene Ontology (GO) [24] and Sequence Ontology (SO) [25] were used to identify genotypic information. Further, small chemical compounds were annotated using the Chemical Entities of Biological Interest database/ontology (ChEBI) [26, 27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%