2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2019.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the gap: Sphenodont remains from the Turonian (Upper Cretaceous) of Patagonia. Palaeobiological inferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discovery of the Naskal rhynchocephalian reinforces the emerging pattern that the group was confined to the southern landmasses of Gondwana after the Early Cretaceous (Evans et al, 2001;Apesteguía and Novas, 2003;Martinelli and Forasiepi, 2004;Apesteguía, 2005;Apesteguía and Rougier, 2007;Apesteguía and Jones, 2012;Apesteguía et al, , 2021Apesteguía and Carballido, 2014;Gentil et al, 2019;Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discovery of the Naskal rhynchocephalian reinforces the emerging pattern that the group was confined to the southern landmasses of Gondwana after the Early Cretaceous (Evans et al, 2001;Apesteguía and Novas, 2003;Martinelli and Forasiepi, 2004;Apesteguía, 2005;Apesteguía and Rougier, 2007;Apesteguía and Jones, 2012;Apesteguía et al, , 2021Apesteguía and Carballido, 2014;Gentil et al, 2019;Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…4). All but the Naskal taxon are from South America and considered members of the deeply nested clades Sphenodontinae and Opisthodontia or Eilenodontinae (e.g., Apesteguía et al, 2014, 2021; Gentil et al, 2019; Chambi-Trowell et al, 2021). The possible relationship between the Naskal taxon and Godavarisaurus would suggest that the Naskal taxon is phylogenetically near the base of Acrosphenodontia, well outside the clades that contain the Late Cretaceous South American forms (e.g., Romo de Vivar et al, 2020; Chambi-Trowell et al, 2021; DeMar et al, in press).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%