Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2652524.2652552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the gap: SE technology transfer into practice

Abstract: Background: Particularly during and after research projects, technology transfer into practice plays an important role for academia to get technologies into use and for industry to improve their development. Objective: Our goal was to gain more and current knowledge about how technology transfer from software engineering (SE) research into industrial practice is accomplished best and how to measure the effectiveness of this transfer.Method: We conducted a study in the context of two German research projects, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several works [26,14] explore means and information needs for successful transfer of technology from academia to industry. Among the findings are the need for information regarding the impact of technologies on product quality, cost, development time, and the preferred sources of information, such as colleagues, textbooks, and industry workshops.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works [26,14] explore means and information needs for successful transfer of technology from academia to industry. Among the findings are the need for information regarding the impact of technologies on product quality, cost, development time, and the preferred sources of information, such as colleagues, textbooks, and industry workshops.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training practitioners to use the new technology is also a frequently mentioned factor for successful transfer (eg, Abernethy et al and Mubeen et al). Therefore, the importance of workshops and meetings to introduce new technologies to software developers is stressed in Diebold and Vetrò and Jedlitschka et al Another frequently mentioned aspect is positive results from cost‐benefit or risk analyses. Another important factor is the way the transfer takes place, ie, by which medium (eg, other studies).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We finally settled on the search string: (transfer) AND (industry OR practice) AND (academia OR university OR research) AND (“software engineering”), which found 20 papers, eight of which matched the ones we found manually. Figure illustrates the ratios between the relevant papers missed (light gray, ie, Rodríguez et al and Sharp et al), the relevant papers found (shaded, ie, previous studies), and the irrelevant papers found (dark gray) by automated search for the search string and also the ratios between the quasi‐gold standard (all papers found by manual search) and the (relevant and irrelevant) results from the automated search. With a sensitivity of 80% and a precision of 40% calculated based on the quasi‐gold standard, this search string can be considered of optimal sensitivity and high precision as defined by Zhang et al…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not intending to be exhaustive and just getting some recent works, these studies are concerned with many distinct topics in SE, such as software development for medical devices ), requirements engineering (Chen et al 2013), software processes (Guo and Seaman 2008;Rodríguez et al 2012;Abrantes and Travassos 2013), pair programming (Rodríguez et al 2012), defect reporting (Bettenburg et al 2008), exploratory testing (Pfahl et al 2014), model-based testing (Dias Neto andTravassos 2008), effort estimation (Basten and Mellis 2011;Vaz 2013), component-based software engineering (Conradi et al 2005;Ji et al 2008), global software development (Humayun et al 2013) and technology transfer (Diebold and Vetrò 2014) among many others.…”
Section: Surveys In Software Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the basic element of analysis from each survey (Hopkins 1982), can be typically established as: de Mello et al Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development (2015) 3:8an organization Diebold and Vetrò 2014) a software project (Conradi et al 2005;Ji et al 2008;Basten and Mellis 2011) an individual (Dias Neto and Travassos 2008;Guo and Seaman 2008;Betenburg 2008;Abrantes and Travassos 2013;Bettenburg et al 2008;Rodríguez et al 2012;Chen et al 2013;Vaz 2013;Humayun et al 2013;Pfahl et al 2014). …”
Section: Surveys In Software Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%