2017
DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2017.2687320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the Gap: Many-Objective Optimization and Informed Decision-Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, there is a need for methods to identify a handful of effective solutions, such as those where a small improvement in one objective leads to a large deterioration in at least one other objective. The existing approaches, including maximum convex bulge/distance from hyperplane, hypervolume contribution, and local curvature [80] are all promising and require a thorough analysis on WDS design problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, there is a need for methods to identify a handful of effective solutions, such as those where a small improvement in one objective leads to a large deterioration in at least one other objective. The existing approaches, including maximum convex bulge/distance from hyperplane, hypervolume contribution, and local curvature [80] are all promising and require a thorough analysis on WDS design problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigation of the methodologies for identifying a handful of useful solutions, such as those where a small improvement in one objective would lead to a large deterioration in at least one other objective, is thus warranted. In addition to game-theoretic models, the approaches that are based on identifying 'knees' of the Pareto front or expected marginal utility, maximum convex bulge/distance from hyperplane, hypervolume contribution and local curvature [80] are all promising methods that require a thorough analysis on WDS problems. Table A1) by year and optimisation approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9] two ranking schemes integrating the preference articulation have been proposed. However, the calculation of the hypervolume indicator presents the drawback that it depends exponentially on the number of objectives and therefore becomes infeasible for multi-objective problems with many objectives, see [4].…”
Section: Progressive Preference Articulation: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance the scalability of MOEAs for MaOPs, a considerable number of attempts [10], [11] have been made to improve the performance of Pareto-based, decomposition-based, and indicator-based methods, which are briefly introduced below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%