Bridging the gap between real estate research and professional practice in Nigeria

Abstract

PurposeBeyond contributing to literature, research findings are expected to reinforce existing best practices while also serving as a springboard for formulating new and more efficient methods of undertaking economic activities. However, academic research is sometimes divorced from implementation and research findings are not always translated into practice. This study, therefore, assesses the impact of real estate research activities and findings on the practice of real estate surveying and valuation in Nigeria as the largest real estate market in Africa.Design/methodology/approachAn online questionnaire survey was conducted to obtain relevant data from Estate Surveyors and Valuers across the country. The survey questions cover reading of academic papers from the field of real estate and the reasons for doing so; whether they have made any changes to their professional practice based on findings from academic papers; and possible barriers to adoption academic research findings in your practice. Mean score ranking and principal component analysis were employed for data analysis.FindingsOut of a total of 61 participants, only 35 have made a change to their professional practice based on findings from academic papers they have read. “Personal development and enlightenment” ranks first on the list of reasons for reading academic papers among the participants while barriers to the adoption of academic research findings relate mainly to education, dissemination and lack of guidance on how to apply research findings.Practical implicationsThe study demonstrates how findings from real estate research are being applied and identifies possible barriers that must be addressed to improve the level of application and consequently, the value of academic studies.Originality/valueThe study provides evidence on barriers to the adoption of academic research and contributes to the global effort to bridge the gap between academia and practice.

Evaluating the knowledge and use of property technology among property academics in Australian universities

“…In analysing the MS ranking, any score between 4.00 and 5.00 is deemed highly important, MS between 3.50 and 3.99 is deemed important, while scores below 3.50 are deemed unimportant (Oyedokun et al ., 2021).…”

Housing Satisfaction Among International Students in Hong Kong

“…This approach was considered appropriate because a wider coverage of the respondents can be reached simultaneously, and the data collected would be error-free to a large extent, thereby enhancing data reliability (Dix & Anderson, 2000). This data collection approach is common in the literature (Abidoye et al, 2019;Ameyaw & Chan, 2015;Oyedokun et al, 2021). The questionnaire contained four sections.…”

“…A similar approach has been adopted in previous studies (see Najib et al, 2011;Sawyerr & Yusof, 2013;Adewunmi et al, 2017;Poon, 2019). In analysing the MS, any score between 4.00 and 5.00 is deemed highly important, an MS between 3.50 and 3.99 is deemed important, and scores below 3.50 are considered unimportant (Oyedokun et al, 2021). In addition, the Chisquare (X 2 ) test was conducted to examine the statistical relationship that exists between selected student characteristics and student housing factors, i) the possibility of retaining their current accommodation next academic session, ii) the possibility of recommending their current accommodation to their friends and iii) overall satisfaction with their current accommodation.…”