Bridging Restoration Science and Practice: Results and Analysis of a Survey from the 2009 Society for Ecological Restoration International Meeting

Abstract

Developing and strengthening a more mutualistic relationship between the science of restoration ecology and the practice of ecological restoration has been a central but elusive goal of SERI since its inaugural meeting in 1989. We surveyed the delegates to the 2009 SERI World Conference to learn more about their perceptions of and ideas for improving restoration science, practice, and scientist/practitioner relationships. The respondents' assessments of restoration practice were less optimistic than their assessments of restoration science. Only 26% believed that scientist/practitioner relationships were "generally mutually beneficial and supportive of each other," and the "science-practice gap" was the second and third most frequently cited category of factors limiting the science and practice of restoration, respectively ("insufficient funding" was first in both cases). Although few faulted practitioners for ignoring available science, many criticized scientists for ignoring the pressing needs of practitioners and/or failing to effectively communicate their work to nonscientists. Most of the suggestions for bridging the gap between restoration science and practice focused on (1) developing the necessary political support for more funding of restoration science, practice, and outreach; and (2) creating alternative research paradigms to both facilitate on-the-ground projects and promote more mutualistic exchanges between scientists and practitioners. We suggest that one way to implement these recommendations is to create a "Restoration Extension Service" modeled after the United States Department of Agriculture's Cooperative Extension Service. We also recommend more events that bring together a fuller spectrum of restoration scientists, practitioners, and relevant stakeholders.

When peer-reviewed publications are not enough! Delivering science for natural resource management

“…However, the relevance of the research and communication, which had a large impact of customer satisfaction, was not as highly rated. The knowledge gap between science and natural resource management, however, is a well characterized problem of the institution of modern science (McNie, 2007;Shanley and Lopez, 2009;Sunderland et al, 2009;Arlettaz et al, 2010;Cabin et al, 2010;Esler et al, 2010;Groffman et al, 2010;Sessa and Ricci, 2010). Senior Forest Service leaders and some agency scientists are exploring ways to address these issues, focusing on improving the effectiveness of delivering knowledge (GAO, 2010).…”

Modeling caterpillar movement to guide habitat enhancement for Speyeria zerene hippolyta, the Oregon silverspot butterfly

“…However, these studies have not always had as great an impact on the management of sensitive species and habitats as we might wish (Milner-Gulland et al 2009;Arlettaz et al 2010;Cabin et al 2010;MilnerGulland et al 2012). There are many reasons for the variable impact of conservation-oriented research.…”

Phylogenetic relatedness as a tool in restoration ecology: a meta-analysis

“…The unprecedented level of native habitat perturbation and the concomitant loss of biodiversity demand that ecologists fill the gap between restoration science and practice [1,2]. This means that ecological restoration will be a key process for the conservation of biodiversity, which can benefit from the fast-growing body of knowledge acquired among disciplines such as community ecology or evolutionary ecology.…”