2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging Computational Features Toward Multiple Semantic Features with Multi-task Regression: A Study of CT Pulmonary Nodules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pulmonary nodules with different malignant phenotypes exhibited a number of morphological characteristics. In the LIDC-IDRI dataset, the malignant phenotype of the lung nodules was quantified by the physician using specific numbers and the quantification range was set to 1-5, according to the definition of dataset (14,16). The probability of malignancy was indicated as follows: i) Malignancy 1, high probability of being benign; ii) malignancy 2, moderate probability of being benign; iii) malignancy 3, indeterminate probability being benign; iv) malignancy 4, moderate probability of being malignant; and v) malignancy 5, high probability of being malignant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pulmonary nodules with different malignant phenotypes exhibited a number of morphological characteristics. In the LIDC-IDRI dataset, the malignant phenotype of the lung nodules was quantified by the physician using specific numbers and the quantification range was set to 1-5, according to the definition of dataset (14,16). The probability of malignancy was indicated as follows: i) Malignancy 1, high probability of being benign; ii) malignancy 2, moderate probability of being benign; iii) malignancy 3, indeterminate probability being benign; iv) malignancy 4, moderate probability of being malignant; and v) malignancy 5, high probability of being malignant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concomitantly, physical examination and imaging of lung nodules is becoming increasingly onerous and presents a major challenge for physicians, affecting the diagnostic classification accuracy (Acc) of lung nodules. The continuous development of machine learning has enabled the application of advanced learning techniques in the research and diagnosis of a number of diseases (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). The information derived from lung nodule image data can be combined with machine learning in order to investigate the association between lung cancer incidence and clinicopathological features (18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Buty et al [12] combined spherical harmonics along with deep CNN features and then classified them using RF. However, the use of CNN for lung nodule classification has been confined to 2D image analysis [13], thus falling short of utilizing the important volumetric and contextual information.…”
Section: D Cnn For Attribute 'M'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few years, discriminative deep‐learning approaches demonstrated substantial improvement over traditional machine learning approaches in different tasks including image classification and segmentation . Similarly, such approaches were applied successfully for abnormality detection in medical images . For a general review of deep‐learning approaches for computer‐aided detection of abnormalities in medical images we refer the reader to the review by Hoo‐Chang et al …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Similarly, such approaches were applied successfully for abnormality detection in medical images. 10,12,13 For a general review of deep-learning approaches for computer-aided detection of abnormalities in medical images we refer the reader to the review by Hoo-Chang et al 14 However, these discriminative deep-learning approaches rely heavily upon the availability of vast amounts of both normal and abnormal samples with explicit annotation by experts which is very challenging to collect. Moreover, due to the large variability in abnormal samples, these models usually require specific training tuned to detect each abnormality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%