2023
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1259422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging citizen science and science communication: insights from a global study of science communicators

Joseph Roche,
Eric A. Jensen,
Aaron M. Jensen
et al.

Abstract: A large study of science communicators around the world was conducted as part of the GlobalSCAPE research project. All participants in the study indicated some level of science communication experience, with more than 11% choosing “citizen scientist” as one of their identities. This paper provides an overview of how science communication and citizen science are two independent fields of research and practice that have opportunities for overlap and mutually beneficial outcomes, particularly in terms of the prac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As science communication grows as a field of research and practice, it is becoming increasingly prominent as an academic discipline taught in universities around the world. Science communication encompasses a broad field of research and practice [Lewenstein, 2022] and so defining its teaching can overlap with training [ Baram-Tsabari & Lewenstein, 2017;Lewenstein & Baram-Tsabari, 2022], informal science education [Land-Zandstra, de Bakker & Jensen, 2020], citizen science [Rüfenacht et al, 2021;Roche et al, 2023], and public engagement [Silva & Bultitude, 2009]. Many of the challenges facing science communication educators are specific to local contexts but the ways in which such barriers and obstacles are addressed and overcome can be equally relevant to educators working in other regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As science communication grows as a field of research and practice, it is becoming increasingly prominent as an academic discipline taught in universities around the world. Science communication encompasses a broad field of research and practice [Lewenstein, 2022] and so defining its teaching can overlap with training [ Baram-Tsabari & Lewenstein, 2017;Lewenstein & Baram-Tsabari, 2022], informal science education [Land-Zandstra, de Bakker & Jensen, 2020], citizen science [Rüfenacht et al, 2021;Roche et al, 2023], and public engagement [Silva & Bultitude, 2009]. Many of the challenges facing science communication educators are specific to local contexts but the ways in which such barriers and obstacles are addressed and overcome can be equally relevant to educators working in other regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Science communication, a field of both practice and research, involves the exchange of knowledge, often between scientific experts and public audiences (Burns et al, 2003;Trench, 2008;Bultitude, 2011), while public engagement is understood to be a practice that also involves various publics in science (Rowe and Frewer, 2005;Stilgoe et al, 2014). There are a number of similarities and synergies among the fields, and together, they have the potential to strengthen trust between science and society (Golumbic et al, 2020;Roche et al, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%