2003
DOI: 10.1021/ol034348l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridgehead Enolates:  Substitution and Asymmetric Desymmetrization of Small Bridged Carbonyl Compounds by Lithium Amide Bases

Abstract: [reaction: see text] Contrary to expectations, a number of bridged carbonyl compounds undergo facile bridgehead metalation with lithium amide bases. Diketone, lactone, lactam, and imide functions are all demonstrated to participate in this type of "bridgehead enolate" chemistry, leading to a range of substituted products. Meso compounds can also be desymmetrized in very high ee by asymmetric bridgehead metalation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of our successful bridgehead lithiation−substitution results on related [3.3.1] systems, we anticipated adopting this method for appending appropriate substituents onto a core structure 5 at either (or both) bridgehead substituent. Direct substitution at the vinylic position (C-3) by metalation also appeared viable .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of our successful bridgehead lithiation−substitution results on related [3.3.1] systems, we anticipated adopting this method for appending appropriate substituents onto a core structure 5 at either (or both) bridgehead substituent. Direct substitution at the vinylic position (C-3) by metalation also appeared viable .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R f = 0.43; EtOAc/n-Hex = 1:1. 1 H NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl 3 , δ): 2.00–2.10 (m, 1H, H-10), 2.26 (dddd, J = 1.6, 3.6, 6.8, and 13.2 Hz, 1H, H-10), 2.67 (dd, J = 8.4 and 15.6 Hz, 1H, H-5), 2.94 (dd, J = 4.8 and 15.6 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.62 (s, 3H, −NHCO 2 C H 3 ), 3.72 (s, 3H, −CO 2 C H 3 ), 3.73 (s, 3H, −OC H 3 at C-8), 3.90–4.02 (m, 2H, H-1 and H-4), 5.54 (brs, 1H, −N H ), 6.69 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, H-9), 6.73 (dd, J = 2.8 and 8.4 Hz, 1H, H-7), 6.97 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, H-6). 13 C NMR (100 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl 3 , δ): 31.8 (t, C-10), 34.9 (t, C-5), 44.2 (d, C-1), 45.5 (d, C-4), 51.8 (q, −NHCO 2 C H 3 ), 52.3 (q, −CO 2 C H 3 ), 55.2 (q, −O C H 3 at C-8), 113.1 (d, C-9), 113.3 (d, C-7), 126.4 (s, C-5a), 130.6 (d, C-6), 132.8 (s, C-9a), 156.3 (s, −NH C O 2 CH 3 ), 158.0 (s, C-8), 175.0 (s, C-2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions generally brought formation of either decomposed residue or starting material recovery. Although the Simpkins’ protocol , using LDA/LiCl or LTMP/LiCl complex followed by alkylating reagents was known as a practical route to alkylate the bridge methine in a bicyclo system, the conditions only afforded an undesired N -methyl lactam 10 . Formation of N -methylated product 10 could be attributed to the fact that the strong base reacted first with the N-carbamate group to yield the resulting anion, rather than abstracted a proton from the methine position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Examples of reactions described in our 2003 communication are shown in Scheme 1. 12 The conversion of [3.3.1]dione 5 into the silylated derivative 6, albeit in modest yield, was a first indication that bridgehead substitution in a parent system closely related to those present in PPAPs could be realized. This particular example is atypical, in that the 1,3-diketone is surely enolized first, thus implicating either a dianion or perhaps a labile enol silane as intermediate.…”
Section: Inspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%