Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2003.1239122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge weigh-in-motion system development using superposition of dynamic truck/static bridge interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies also point out that road roughness and vehicle velocity will affect the GVW recognition accuracy because of the vehicle-bridge coupling vibration. The faster the vehicle drives, the larger the GVW recognition errors are [40]. However, according to the obtained results, this issue is not significant in this research.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis For Identification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Previous studies also point out that road roughness and vehicle velocity will affect the GVW recognition accuracy because of the vehicle-bridge coupling vibration. The faster the vehicle drives, the larger the GVW recognition errors are [40]. However, according to the obtained results, this issue is not significant in this research.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis For Identification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The weight estimation methods, in this class of assumption, determine axle weights of the vehicle by comparing the measured bridge responses with those obtained from bridge influence lines (e.g. see Moses 1978, Kriss 1979, Gagarine 1991, WAVE 2001, Leming and Stalford 2003, Rowley et al 2008. The determined individual axle weights are then summed to estimate the gross weight of vehicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, authors like Jiang et al [12], Au et al [13], Law et al [14], Deng and Cai [15], Pan and Yu [16] and Kim et al [17] sought to employ different optimization techniques to solve the problem, from the use of genetic algorithms to artificial neural networks. Besides these systems in time domain, several authors proposed methods that use the bridge dynamic response ( [18], [19], [20], [21] e [22]). Nevertheless, these methods are still quite complex and difficult to implement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%