2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74421-6_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge Structural Identification Using Moving Vehicle Acceleration Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the recorded sensor data are amalgamated with the vibration from other sources mentioned above, conventional SHM methods cannot be directly applied as they are designed to work with pure structural vibration responses [ 46 ]. To circumvent this problem, the existing literature addresses primary approaches: (1) controlling the sensing conditions like vehicle speed and road roughness intensity so that the recorded response mainly contains the bridge vibration [ 14 , 27 ], (2) modeling the vehicle–bridge interaction in a closed form to eliminate the uncertainties due to vibration sources other than the bridge itself [ 47 , 48 ], (3) to use blind source separation (BSS) techniques to extract the different sources of the recorded response [ 35 ]. The BSS technique is capable of estimating pure bridge vibration response.…”
Section: Proposed Framework and Its Significance In Bridge Shmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the recorded sensor data are amalgamated with the vibration from other sources mentioned above, conventional SHM methods cannot be directly applied as they are designed to work with pure structural vibration responses [ 46 ]. To circumvent this problem, the existing literature addresses primary approaches: (1) controlling the sensing conditions like vehicle speed and road roughness intensity so that the recorded response mainly contains the bridge vibration [ 14 , 27 ], (2) modeling the vehicle–bridge interaction in a closed form to eliminate the uncertainties due to vibration sources other than the bridge itself [ 47 , 48 ], (3) to use blind source separation (BSS) techniques to extract the different sources of the recorded response [ 35 ]. The BSS technique is capable of estimating pure bridge vibration response.…”
Section: Proposed Framework and Its Significance In Bridge Shmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matarazzo et al [ 33 , 34 ] introduced the “structural identification using expectation maximization (STRIDE)” method for mode shape identification from mobile sensors. Eshkevari et al [ 35 , 36 , 37 ] formulated mobile sensing data as a sparse matrix with missing values. They employed alternating least-square (ALS) for matrix completion, followed by principal component analysis (PCA) and structured optimization analysis (SOA) for modal identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several field tests have demonstrated the feasibility and reliability of using the VSM to extract bridge frequencies indirectly [ 12 , 13 ]. In recent years, the VSM has gained popularity for identifying frequencies of bridge systems [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Many scholars all around the world have carried out research based on the VSM, and an array of advanced filtering techniques have been used to extract the bridge frequencies from the vehicle signals, such as the empirical modal decomposition (EMD) [ 19 ], the variational modal decomposition (VMD) [ 20 ], and the stochastic subspace (SSI) methods [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasible characteristic index of frequency information is the frequency band of small distortion (FBSD), which is within ±5% or ±10% amplitude deviation due to the extreme conditions of dynamic measurement [3]. In [4][5][6][7], the assumed second-order model is adopted to depict the nonlinear error characteristics of accelerometer. Also, in [8][9], the state-space transfer function assumes the accelerometer model to be an ordinary second-order difference function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%