2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge stress calculation based on the dynamic response of coupled train–bridge system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e modal analysis results illustrate that the first vibration mode is the lateral vibration with the natural frequency f 1 � 2.9 Hz and the second vibration mode is the vertical vibration with the corresponding frequency f 2 � 5.62 Hz. Table 2 presents a comparison for natural frequencies between the numerical results and the measured ones in [26]. e results illustrate a good agreement between them with the relative differences smaller than 5%, which validates the accuracy of the bridge model.…”
Section: Ballasted Track-bridge Modelsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e modal analysis results illustrate that the first vibration mode is the lateral vibration with the natural frequency f 1 � 2.9 Hz and the second vibration mode is the vertical vibration with the corresponding frequency f 2 � 5.62 Hz. Table 2 presents a comparison for natural frequencies between the numerical results and the measured ones in [26]. e results illustrate a good agreement between them with the relative differences smaller than 5%, which validates the accuracy of the bridge model.…”
Section: Ballasted Track-bridge Modelsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Yu and Mao [25] presented a random wheel-rail force model based on MATLAB and random theory to analyze the probability analysis of high-speed railway TBS. Li et al [26] proposed a direct stiffness method for the strain analysis of a steel bridge based on the vehicle-bridge coupled dynamic system. An existing steel bridge and a simply supported concrete bridge were taken as an example to validate the reliability of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally VBCV problems can be solved by iterative or coupled methods. The iterative method usually has a high computation cost to achieve numerical convergence (Chatterjee et al 1994;Broquet et al 2004); for the coupled method, vehicle and bridge coupled motion equations are assembled and solved by direct integration methods such as the Newmark and Runge-Kutta method (Fafard et al 1998;Kim et al 2005;Deng et al 2010;Li et al 2015). Furthermore, modal superposition is a general technique used in solving VBCV problems because it significantly reduces the calculation effort by reducing the size of the matrices in the equation (Xia et al 2000;Xu et al 2010;Yin et al 2010a).…”
Section: Vehicle-bridge Coupled Vibration Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one thing, in the design codes, sometimes the conventional consideration of the factors for fatigue assessment is confusing due to the regardless of real operation conditions [147]. For another, the stress obtained from the conventional moving load approach is not accurate enough compared with the measured data [148]. By contrast, the systematic approach with TTBDI considered is more reasonable and practical.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Fatigue Life Of Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%