2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge hosts for avian influenza viruses at the wildlife/domestic interface: An eco-epidemiological framework implemented in southern Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Caron et al . ). Then targeted epidemiological sampling using species‐specific capture techniques should help testing these hypotheses with proper sample sizes per species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Caron et al . ). Then targeted epidemiological sampling using species‐specific capture techniques should help testing these hypotheses with proper sample sizes per species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The first conceptual model of risk pathways describing potential synanthropic wildlife species that could potentially transport IAVs from maintenance hosts (Anseriformes and Charadriiformes) onto farms was published in 200613. More recently, researchers have begun to identify methods for prioritizing target bridge host species for IAV surveillance2739. In a comprehensive review of bridge hosts in disease ecology, with a focus on IAVs, bridge hosts were defined as non-maintenance host species capable of transmitting a pathogen from a reservoir population to a target population40.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results and the ubiquitous and synanthropic nature of wild pigeons highlight their potential role as indicator species for the presence of Newcastle disease virus of low virulence in the environment. The reverse spillover of live agents from domestic animals to wildlife as a result of the expansion of livestock industries employing massive amounts of live virus vaccines represent an underappreciated and poorly studied effect of human activity on wildlife.The livestock-wildlife interface, historically underappreciated as a cause of disease emergence, is now recognized as an intersection from which pathogens can be transmitted from agricultural to free-ranging hosts, and vice versa [1][2][3][4]. Some factors responsible for the presence of etiological agents at this interface include ecological changes such as spatial and temporal landuse alterations, pathogen adaptations to new hosts, and the introduction of non-native, permissive species [5][6][7][8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%