2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10248878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge Health Monitoring via Displacement Reconstruction-Based NB-IoT Technology

Abstract: An aged bridge’s performance is affected by degradation and becomes one of the major concerns in maintenance. A preliminary, simple and workable procedure of bridge damage detection is required to minimize maintenance costs. In the past, frequency is one of the most common indicators to detect damage occurrence. Recent research found that using frequency as a health indicator still has room to improve. Alternatively, dynamic displacement is used as an indicator in the current study. These dynamic displacements… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By considering that a f 1,exp of 15.62 Hz was identified at 291 days of prestressing (Figure 4(b)), that is, when N 0x,aver = 515 kN, f 1,exp only increased by 0.5% despite the long-term losses of prestress force (N 0x,aver ) by almost 7%. This confirmed the fundamental frequency f 1,exp as an uncertain indicator of prestress losses (Thedy et al, 2020). Tables 3 and 4 compare the experimental values of the cross-sectional second moment of the area (I 1I,exp ) (equation ( 2) with f 1,exp ) with the reference ones (I 1I ) obtained from the solution proposed by Song, as explained in According to the solution proposed by Song.…”
Section: According To the Experimental Fundamental Frequenciessupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By considering that a f 1,exp of 15.62 Hz was identified at 291 days of prestressing (Figure 4(b)), that is, when N 0x,aver = 515 kN, f 1,exp only increased by 0.5% despite the long-term losses of prestress force (N 0x,aver ) by almost 7%. This confirmed the fundamental frequency f 1,exp as an uncertain indicator of prestress losses (Thedy et al, 2020). Tables 3 and 4 compare the experimental values of the cross-sectional second moment of the area (I 1I,exp ) (equation ( 2) with f 1,exp ) with the reference ones (I 1I ) obtained from the solution proposed by Song, as explained in According to the solution proposed by Song.…”
Section: According To the Experimental Fundamental Frequenciessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Conversely, dynamic nondestructive methods are unsuitable because a change in prestress force does not significantly influence the PC girder-bridges' vibrational response (Bonopera et al, 2018a(Bonopera et al, , 2019a. This makes the fundamental frequency as an uncertain indicator of prestress losses (Thedy et al, 2020). However, dynamic methods require an accurate selection of the mode shape because different natural frequencies provide varying degrees of accuracy in prestress force estimations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides extended coverage to delay-tolerant, low-cost, low-energy IoT applications, reaching good energy performance even in the worse-case, continuous transmission scenarios when compared to other communication protocols [17]. It represents a valuable choice for application fields that require massive deployments, good coverage and low data rates, including smart metering [33], smart grids [34], smart cities [35], healthcare [36][37][38], and industrial applications [39]. To the best of the authors' knowledge, it has still been seldom applied in home automation [40], mostly in home surveillance or metering applications [41,42], and rarely using MQTT.…”
Section: Narrowband Iotmentioning
confidence: 99%