Bridge headwater afflux estimation using bootstrap resampling method

Abstract

The bridge structure's development causes a riverbed cross-sections contraction. This influences the flow regime, being visible during catastrophic floods. Then the flow velocity increases and water piles up upstream the bridge, where headwater afflux could be observed. These changes depend on the watercourse geometry and the bridge cross-section properties, especially on the degree of flow contraction under the bridge. Hydraulic conditions under the bridge depend on flow velocity, dimensions, and shape of abutments, the granulometric composition of bedload, which can be quantitatively characterized by hydraulic resistance coefficients. The research subject of headwater afflux is equated with the recognition of morphodynamic processes occurring along the passage route. The headwater afflux could be estimated by empirical formulas and by the energy method using Bernoulli's law. Empirical methods are optimized by adopting various statistical criteria. This paper compares the headwater afflux values calculated using two existing empirical formulas, Rehbock and Yarnell, and compares them with the results of laboratory tests. Following the assumption that the free water surface is influenced by flow resistance, an attempt was made to include friction velocity in the empirical formulas. Based on the Authors' database, the coefficients used were optimized using bootstrap resampling in Monte Carlo simulation. The analyses demonstrated that the formula best describing the phenomenon of headwater afflux upstream the bridge is an empirical formula built based on the historical Yarnell formula, which includes friction velocity value. The optimized equation provides an average relative error of 12.9% in relation to laboratory observations.

On the resistance of concrete hollow thin-walled high piers to rock collisions

“…Researchers are more inclined to utilize numerical simulations over full-sized tests when studying the collision performance of piers [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. In addition, researchers also studied the resistance of bridge piers under rock collision using numerical simulation [13][14][15][16][17]. However, these studies mainly focused on solid concrete section bridge piers, and no scholars have yet focused on the resistance of concrete hollow thin-walled high piers under rock collision.…”

Dynamic performance of bridge piers impacted by heavy trucks

“…Therefore, the dynamic solution and design problems of vehicle-bridge collisions have always been a concern of scholars worldwide. Over the past 30 years, experimental, theoretical, and finite element methods have been the three main methods for solving vehicle-bridge collision problems [4][5][6][7][8]. Among them, the experimental method is the most reliable but is costly, and full-scale testing requires enormous manpower and material resources, so there are relatively few full-scale testing studies currently conducted domestically and abroad [9][10][11][12].…”