1996
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(95)00136-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge fatigue damage evaluation and updating using non-destructive inspections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fatigue cracks in their initial phase are usually small in size and hence difficult to detect. Moreover, depending on loading conditions and structural layouts, these cracks may develop rapidly and weaken structural integrity [1,2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatigue cracks in their initial phase are usually small in size and hence difficult to detect. Moreover, depending on loading conditions and structural layouts, these cracks may develop rapidly and weaken structural integrity [1,2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual service life of a steel bridge with existing fatigue damages can be calculated as a function of the fatigue crack growth [9]. These methods have the great advantage that the analysis of the elapsed stress history of a member is no precondition for a prediction of the remaining fatigue life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material parameter C is in general random, typically assumed to be described by the lognormal distribution [5][6][7][8][10][11][12]. The parameters assumed here for this distribution are λ c = −29.13, ζ c = 0.47 [12].…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%