2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge analysis in a Social Internetworking Scenario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To perform this analysis, we discretize degree by applying the logarithmic binning function reported in Table 2. The choice of the logarithmic binning function allows us to obtain almost equal-width bins (Milojević , 2010) due to the well-known power law distribution of node degree (Buccafurri, Foti, Lax, Nocera, & Ursino, 2013;Lu & Wang, 2014).…”
Section: Privacy Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To perform this analysis, we discretize degree by applying the logarithmic binning function reported in Table 2. The choice of the logarithmic binning function allows us to obtain almost equal-width bins (Milojević , 2010) due to the well-known power law distribution of node degree (Buccafurri, Foti, Lax, Nocera, & Ursino, 2013;Lu & Wang, 2014).…”
Section: Privacy Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This table shows that the average degree of Twitter accounts is much higher than that of Facebook. However, because it is well-know that degree in social networks follows a power law distribution (Buccafurri et al, 2013;Lu & Wang, 2014), we need to better investigate this results.…”
Section: Friend Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset used in this experimental campaign is a synthetic graph combined with real-life biometric data. It is well known that the degree of social-network graphs follows a power-law distribution [31], [32], [33]. This can be obtained by using the Barabási-Albert model [34], one of the most famous algorithms for generating random scale-free networks using preferential attachment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the model presented in this paper, the specific scores can be real preferences given by users and which can be automatically extracted by using social network analysis [17,52], be fixed to model concrete scenarios (as Section 6 considers), or simply be random.…”
Section: Definition 2 {Social Choice Function) a Social Choice Functmentioning
confidence: 99%