2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge Afflux Predictions Using the Lattice Boltzmann Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of run time, generally, a two-dimensional model uses much shorter time and less storage than a three-dimensional model. Although there is no literature stating the run time for the three-dimensional compound channel modeling, from previous research [25,26], the lattice Boltzmann model used even shorter time than a conventional model for the same dimensional task; on the other hand, since the distribution Figure 9. The LBM apparent shear stress A xy comparison for different D r .…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of run time, generally, a two-dimensional model uses much shorter time and less storage than a three-dimensional model. Although there is no literature stating the run time for the three-dimensional compound channel modeling, from previous research [25,26], the lattice Boltzmann model used even shorter time than a conventional model for the same dimensional task; on the other hand, since the distribution Figure 9. The LBM apparent shear stress A xy comparison for different D r .…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…;= Qi |@U=vt ?} QkD =@ l}Dq VwQ xm OvO=O u=Wv w OvOQm xO=iDU= 3 utRDrw@ [11] "Ovm|t |v}@V}B Q= Ri=sQv R= xO=iDU= =@ = Q u= QyD um |xv=NOwQ R= |WN@ sy 1391 QwB|Oyt '|m}rwQO}y hrDNt |=yQ}eDt Q}F -=D |UQQ@ ut[ w OQm |R=Ux}@W HEC-RAS 'x}=B x@ u=}QH OQwNQ@ |x}w= R '=yx}=B pmW 'QDU@ |Q@R ? }=Q[ '?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%